FNDE vs. VB
FNDE (Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net), while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDE returned 11.35%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for VB. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNDE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.
Performance
FNDE vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 15.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNDE having a 11.35% annualized return and VB not far ahead at 11.61%.
FNDE
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 6M
- 15.79%
- 1Y
- 31.37%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
VB
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 15.33%
- 6M
- 13.69%
- 1Y
- 30.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
FNDE vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 13.70% | 29.46% | 12.10% | 14.99% | -15.58% | 14.41% | -2.77% | 19.75% | -10.37% | 26.77% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 15.33% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDE and VB is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013 | 0.61 |
The correlation between FNDE and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNDE vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNDE
VB
Technology
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Technology
FNDE
VB
Financial Services
FNDE
VB
Energy
FNDE
VB
Consumer Cyclical
FNDE
VB
Basic Materials
FNDE
VB
Industrials
FNDE
VB
Communication Services
FNDE
VB
Utilities
FNDE
VB
Real Estate
FNDE
VB
Consumer Defensive
FNDE
VB
Healthcare
FNDE
VB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDE vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
FNDE
VB
FNDE vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNDE | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.30 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 3.21 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.67 | 11.80 | -1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNDE vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDE | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.55% | -59.56% | +16.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.23% | -8.98% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.40% | -25.36% | +6.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | -28.15% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.93% | -42.05% | +2.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.19% | 0.00% | -3.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.69% | -8.43% | -3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 2.44% | +0.36% |
Volatility
FNDE vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 5.41%. This indicates that FNDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDE | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 5.41% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.07% | 12.24% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.61% | 16.68% | -1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 20.80% | -3.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 21.44% | -2.14% |
FNDE vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNDE vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than VB's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 3.68% | 4.19% | 4.82% | 4.74% | 5.59% | 4.32% | 2.50% | 3.47% | 2.98% | 2.05% | 1.65% | 2.02% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDE and VB have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNDE has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to VB (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs VB's -59.56%.
On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.61% vs 11.35% for FNDE. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.61% return vs 11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDE.
FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.18% for VB.
FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. FNDE tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net), while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.05% for VB.
FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDE and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer