PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDE vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDE vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 25.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDE has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 9.98%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.80% annualized return.


FNDE

1D
0.92%
1M
5.81%
6M
7.39%
YTD
16.21%
1Y
29.79%
3Y*
20.36%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
9.98%
ALL TIME*
7.27%

SCHD

1D
0.86%
1M
4.51%
6M
12.81%
YTD
25.44%
1Y
31.88%
3Y*
15.21%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*
12.80%
ALL TIME*
13.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$31.25M$31.29M$33.84M
$839.54M$733.40M$694.82M

FNDE vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
16.21%29.46%12.10%14.99%-15.58%14.41%-2.77%19.75%-10.37%26.77%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
25.44%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and SCHD is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between FNDE and SCHD has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FNDE vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDE
SCHD

Financial Services

25.0%
9.9%

Technology

22.3%
12.7%

Energy

13.2%
14.1%

Basic Materials

12.0%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
7.7%

Communication Services

6.6%
6.2%

Industrials

4.6%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
20.6%

Utilities

2.4%
0.1%

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Healthcare

0.4%
20.8%

Financial Services

FNDE
25.0%
SCHD
9.9%

Technology

FNDE
22.3%
SCHD
12.7%

Energy

FNDE
13.2%
SCHD
14.1%

Basic Materials

FNDE
12.0%
SCHD
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDE
8.9%
SCHD
7.7%

Communication Services

FNDE
6.6%
SCHD
6.2%

Industrials

FNDE
4.6%
SCHD
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

FNDE
3.3%
SCHD
20.6%

Utilities

FNDE
2.4%
SCHD
0.1%

Real Estate

FNDE
1.4%
SCHD

-

Healthcare

FNDE
0.4%
SCHD
20.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDE vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNDE
FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNDE vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDESCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.52

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

6.94

-4.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.25

17.52

-8.27

FNDE vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDE and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDESCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.55%

-33.37%

-10.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-4.61%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-16.13%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-16.85%

-12.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.93%

-33.37%

-6.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-0.12%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.61%

-3.29%

-8.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

1.82%

+1.41%

Volatility

FNDE vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.82%. This indicates that FNDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDESCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

3.82%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.38%

8.01%

+5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.13%

11.06%

+5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

14.38%

+2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.13%

16.73%

+2.40%

FNDE vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDE vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than SCHD's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.56%4.19%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.32%2.50%3.47%2.98%2.05%1.65%2.02%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.10%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDE and SCHD have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDE has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to SCHD (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.80% vs 9.98% for FNDE. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.80% return vs 9.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDE.

FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 3.10% for SCHD.

FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FNDE tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net), while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDE and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer