PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDE vs. ROAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDE vs. ROAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly lower than ROAM's 24.58% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDE has outperformed ROAM with an annualized return of 11.02%, while ROAM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.33% annualized return.


FNDE

1D
-2.50%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.69%
1Y
29.54%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
11.02%

ROAM

1D
-3.55%
1M
3.25%
YTD
24.58%
6M
25.40%
1Y
44.77%
3Y*
25.04%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
9.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDE vs. ROAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
11.56%29.46%12.10%14.99%-15.58%14.41%-2.77%19.75%-10.37%26.77%
ROAM
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
24.58%32.08%6.21%21.28%-14.78%9.32%2.24%8.89%-12.24%27.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and ROAM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015

0.86

The correlation between FNDE and ROAM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDE vs. ROAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDE
ROAM

Technology

22.3%
40.0%

Financial Services

16.8%
19.9%

Energy

10.6%
4.8%

Basic Materials

8.0%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
7.4%

Communication Services

3.6%
6.0%

Industrials

3.5%
5.6%

Utilities

1.9%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
4.7%

Healthcare

1.1%
3.1%

Technology

FNDE
22.3%
ROAM
40.0%

Financial Services

FNDE
16.8%
ROAM
19.9%

Energy

FNDE
10.6%
ROAM
4.8%

Basic Materials

FNDE
8.0%
ROAM
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDE
7.9%
ROAM
7.4%

Communication Services

FNDE
3.6%
ROAM
6.0%

Industrials

FNDE
3.5%
ROAM
5.6%

Utilities

FNDE
1.9%
ROAM
2.2%

Real Estate

FNDE
1.5%
ROAM
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

FNDE
1.2%
ROAM
4.7%

Healthcare

FNDE
1.1%
ROAM
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDE vs. ROAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDE
FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

ROAM
ROAM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ROAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROAM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ROAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROAM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDE vs. ROAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDEROAMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.50

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

4.54

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

16.16

-5.74

FNDE vs. ROAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the ROAM Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDE and ROAM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. ROAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, roughly equal to the maximum ROAM drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and ROAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDEROAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.55%

-45.47%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-9.92%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-16.79%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-27.07%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.93%

-45.47%

+5.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.01%

-3.55%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.67%

-11.09%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.78%

+0.06%

Volatility

FNDE vs. ROAM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) is 6.66%, while Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that FNDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDEROAMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

9.09%

-2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

14.83%

-1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.83%

16.66%

-0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

15.60%

+1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.20%

17.95%

+1.25%

FNDE vs. ROAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ROAM's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDE vs. ROAM - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than ROAM's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.75%4.19%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.32%2.50%3.47%2.98%2.05%1.65%2.02%
ROAM
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
2.55%3.17%4.15%5.40%5.23%4.22%3.04%3.55%2.54%1.84%1.89%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FNDE and ROAM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ROAM has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to FNDE (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs ROAM's -45.47%.

On 10-year performance, FNDE leads with 11.02% vs 9.33% for ROAM. On fees, FNDE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FNDE has been the lower-risk option at 6.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 11.02% return vs 9.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for ROAM.

FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 2.55% for ROAM.

FNDE tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net), while ROAM tracks Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.44% for ROAM.

ROAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDE and ROAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer