FNDE vs. IVAL
FNDE (Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and IVAL (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net), while IVAL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. FNDE is passively managed, while IVAL is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDE returned 9.98%/yr vs 8.06%/yr for IVAL. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.39% expense ratio.
Performance
FNDE vs. IVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly lower than IVAL's 17.27% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDE has outperformed IVAL with an annualized return of 9.98%, while IVAL has yielded a comparatively lower 8.06% annualized return.
FNDE
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 5.81%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 1Y
- 29.79%
- 3Y*
- 20.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.27%
IVAL
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 7.33%
- YTD
- 17.27%
- 1Y
- 32.66%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 10.08%
- 10Y*
- 8.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.69%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $31.25M | $31.29M | $33.84M | |
| $687.80K | $500.06K | $666.23K |
FNDE vs. IVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 16.21% | 29.46% | 12.10% | 14.99% | -15.58% | 14.41% | -2.77% | 19.75% | -10.37% | 26.77% |
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF | 17.27% | 34.92% | -0.71% | 20.61% | -10.06% | -0.22% | -4.94% | 21.26% | -22.50% | 31.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDE and IVAL is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2014 | 0.67 |
The correlation between FNDE and IVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNDE vs. IVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNDE
IVAL
Financial Services
-
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Financial Services
FNDE
IVAL
-
Technology
FNDE
IVAL
Energy
FNDE
IVAL
Basic Materials
FNDE
IVAL
Consumer Cyclical
FNDE
IVAL
Communication Services
FNDE
IVAL
Industrials
FNDE
IVAL
Consumer Defensive
FNDE
IVAL
Utilities
FNDE
IVAL
-
Real Estate
FNDE
IVAL
-
Healthcare
FNDE
IVAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDE vs. IVAL — Risk / Return Rank
FNDE
IVAL
FNDE vs. IVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNDE | IVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.92 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.25 | 9.51 | -0.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNDE vs. IVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, smaller than the maximum IVAL drawdown of -46.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and IVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDE | IVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.55% | -46.09% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.23% | -11.24% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.40% | -14.92% | -3.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | -28.51% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.93% | -46.09% | +6.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -1.68% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.61% | -11.87% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 3.44% | -0.21% |
Volatility
FNDE vs. IVAL - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) have volatilities of 4.18% and 4.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDE | IVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 4.16% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.38% | 12.92% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.13% | 15.50% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 17.77% | -0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 18.60% | +0.53% |
FNDE vs. IVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FNDE and IVAL have an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Dividends
FNDE vs. IVAL - Dividend Comparison
FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than IVAL's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 3.56% | 4.19% | 4.82% | 4.74% | 5.59% | 4.32% | 2.50% | 3.47% | 2.98% | 2.05% | 1.65% | 2.02% |
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF | 2.60% | 2.75% | 3.60% | 5.15% | 8.00% | 3.95% | 2.07% | 2.51% | 2.93% | 1.73% | 2.02% | 1.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDE and IVAL have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNDE has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to IVAL (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs IVAL's -46.09%.
On 10-year performance, FNDE leads with 9.98% vs 8.06% for IVAL. Both ETFs have the same 0.39% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 9.98% return vs 8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNDE and IVAL have the same expense ratio: 0.39% per year.
FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 2.60% for IVAL.
FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IVAL is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Alpha Architect.
IVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDE and IVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer