PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDE vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDE vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDE has underperformed FNDX with an annualized return of 11.02%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.48% annualized return.


FNDE

1D
-2.50%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.69%
1Y
29.54%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
11.02%

FNDX

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.52%
YTD
14.31%
6M
13.73%
1Y
30.33%
3Y*
20.33%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*
14.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDE vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
11.56%29.46%12.10%14.99%-15.58%14.41%-2.77%19.75%-10.37%26.77%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
14.31%16.94%16.77%18.23%-6.92%31.73%9.12%28.65%-7.30%17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and FNDX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.66

The correlation between FNDE and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDE vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDE
FNDX

Technology

22.3%
22.1%

Financial Services

16.8%
13.3%

Energy

10.6%
9.3%

Basic Materials

8.0%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
9.1%

Communication Services

3.6%
9.9%

Industrials

3.5%
9.1%

Utilities

1.9%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
7.0%

Healthcare

1.1%
11.9%

Technology

FNDE
22.3%
FNDX
22.1%

Financial Services

FNDE
16.8%
FNDX
13.3%

Energy

FNDE
10.6%
FNDX
9.3%

Basic Materials

FNDE
8.0%
FNDX
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDE
7.9%
FNDX
9.1%

Communication Services

FNDE
3.6%
FNDX
9.9%

Industrials

FNDE
3.5%
FNDX
9.1%

Utilities

FNDE
1.9%
FNDX
3.0%

Real Estate

FNDE
1.5%
FNDX
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

FNDE
1.2%
FNDX
7.0%

Healthcare

FNDE
1.1%
FNDX
11.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDE vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDE
FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDE vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDEFNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.53

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

5.02

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

19.42

-9.00

FNDE vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDE and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, which is greater than FNDX's maximum drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDEFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.55%

-37.72%

-5.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-6.06%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-16.30%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-19.06%

-10.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.93%

-37.72%

-2.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.01%

-1.43%

-3.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.67%

-3.55%

-8.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

1.57%

+1.27%

Volatility

FNDE vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 3.33%. This indicates that FNDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDEFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

3.33%

+3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

7.63%

+5.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.83%

10.47%

+5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

15.18%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.20%

17.48%

+1.72%

FNDE vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDE vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than FNDX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.75%4.19%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.32%2.50%3.47%2.98%2.05%1.65%2.02%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.45%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDE and FNDX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDE has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to FNDX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

On 10-year performance, FNDX leads with 14.48% vs 11.02% for FNDE. On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 14.48% return vs 11.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDE.

FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 1.45% for FNDX.

FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. FNDE tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net), while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDE and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer