PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDE vs. DNL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDE vs. DNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDE achieves a 13.31% return, which is significantly higher than DNL's 11.68% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDE has outperformed DNL with an annualized return of 10.04%, while DNL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.03% annualized return.


FNDE

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.71%
6M
7.89%
YTD
13.31%
1Y
26.74%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
10.20%
10Y*
10.04%

DNL

1D
0.90%
1M
-0.79%
6M
6.14%
YTD
11.68%
1Y
16.46%
3Y*
9.72%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
9.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDE vs. DNL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
13.31%29.46%12.10%14.99%-15.58%14.41%-2.77%19.75%-10.37%26.77%
DNL
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
11.68%17.03%-0.61%17.00%-22.38%16.14%18.22%36.23%-14.76%31.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDE and DNL is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.81

The correlation between FNDE and DNL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDE vs. DNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDE
DNL

Technology

22.7%
35.1%

Financial Services

22.4%
4.0%

Basic Materials

10.7%
3.2%

Energy

10.5%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
18.3%

Communication Services

5.5%
6.0%

Industrials

3.7%
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
1.1%

Utilities

2.1%
0.5%

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Healthcare

1.1%
10.1%

Technology

FNDE
22.7%
DNL
35.1%

Financial Services

FNDE
22.4%
DNL
4.0%

Basic Materials

FNDE
10.7%
DNL
3.2%

Energy

FNDE
10.5%
DNL
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDE
8.4%
DNL
18.3%

Communication Services

FNDE
5.5%
DNL
6.0%

Industrials

FNDE
3.7%
DNL
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

FNDE
3.0%
DNL
1.1%

Utilities

FNDE
2.1%
DNL
0.5%

Real Estate

FNDE
1.4%
DNL

-

Healthcare

FNDE
1.1%
DNL
10.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDE vs. DNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDE
FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

DNL
DNL Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
DNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNL Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
DNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNL Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDE vs. DNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDEDNLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.16

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.33

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.52

4.71

+3.81

FNDE vs. DNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the DNL Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDE and DNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDE vs. DNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDE drawdown since its inception was -43.55%, roughly equal to the maximum DNL drawdown of -44.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDE and DNL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDEDNLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.55%

-44.53%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.23%

-12.42%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-20.15%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-34.85%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.93%

-34.85%

-5.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-1.38%

-2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.65%

-10.12%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

3.50%

-0.36%

Volatility

FNDE vs. DNL - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) and WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) have volatilities of 5.15% and 5.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDEDNLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

5.12%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.60%

16.19%

-2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.99%

18.89%

-2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.10%

18.45%

-1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.13%

18.57%

+0.56%

FNDE vs. DNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DNL's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDE vs. DNL - Dividend Comparison

FNDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than DNL's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNL
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.30%2.06%2.30%1.81%4.82%1.38%1.76%1.93%2.55%1.86%2.51%1.98%
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.65%4.19%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.32%2.50%3.47%2.98%2.05%1.65%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDE and DNL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDE has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to DNL (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDE dropped -43.55% vs DNL's -44.53%.

On 10-year performance, FNDE leads with 10.04% vs 9.03% for DNL. On fees, FNDE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 10.04% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DNL.

FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 1.30% for DNL.

FNDE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DNL is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FNDE tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net), while DNL tracks WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDE and 0.58% for DNL.

FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDE and DNL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer