FNDC vs. DISVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and DFA International Small Cap Value Portfolio (DISVX).
FNDC is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. DISVX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Dec 28, 1994.
Performance
FNDC vs. DISVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNDC vs. DISVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF | 5.54% | 35.65% | 1.38% | 14.92% | -14.71% | 10.26% | 6.58% | 20.58% | -19.10% | 29.22% |
DISVX DFA International Small Cap Value Portfolio | 3.04% | 52.17% | 7.88% | 17.58% | -9.80% | 15.84% | 0.82% | 21.04% | -23.36% | 25.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDC achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly higher than DISVX's 3.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDC has underperformed DISVX with an annualized return of 8.69%, while DISVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.34% annualized return.
FNDC
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- 5.54%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- 1Y
- 34.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.32%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.69%
DISVX
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- -8.51%
- YTD
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 41.86%
- 3Y*
- 23.14%
- 5Y*
- 13.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDC vs. DISVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DISVX's 0.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FNDC vs. DISVX — Risk / Return Rank
FNDC
DISVX
FNDC vs. DISVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and DFA International Small Cap Value Portfolio (DISVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDC | DISVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.19 | 2.59 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.99 | 3.17 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.52 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 2.98 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.02 | 11.76 | +0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDC | DISVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.59 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.86 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.62 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.51 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDC and DISVX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FNDC vs. DISVX - Dividend Comparison
FNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than DISVX's 7.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF | 3.66% | 3.86% | 3.59% | 2.86% | 1.98% | 2.58% | 1.77% | 2.71% | 2.68% | 1.94% | 1.95% | 1.30% |
DISVX DFA International Small Cap Value Portfolio | 7.00% | 7.17% | 4.56% | 3.87% | 2.40% | 3.51% | 1.84% | 3.97% | 5.91% | 3.77% | 5.85% | 3.51% |
Drawdowns
FNDC vs. DISVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDC drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, smaller than the maximum DISVX drawdown of -61.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDC and DISVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDC | DISVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.22% | -61.57% | +18.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -13.26% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.13% | -27.43% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.22% | -49.24% | +6.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.95% | -9.95% | +3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.53% | -12.23% | +3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 3.36% | -0.45% |
Volatility
FNDC vs. DISVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) is 6.60%, while DFA International Small Cap Value Portfolio (DISVX) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that FNDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DISVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNDC | DISVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 7.27% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.39% | 11.02% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.88% | 16.51% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.83% | 15.98% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 16.74% | -0.02% |