PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNCL vs. XLFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNCL vs. XLFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNCL achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly higher than XLFI's 3.17% return.


FNCL

1D
-0.16%
1M
2.30%
6M
7.40%
YTD
5.30%
1Y
13.08%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
13.39%
ALL TIME*
11.78%

XLFI

1D
-0.41%
1M
2.09%
6M
4.95%
YTD
3.17%
1Y
11.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.49M$8.37M$7.85M
$205.39K$226.21K$175.11K

FNCL vs. XLFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FNCL and XLFI is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.96

The correlation between FNCL and XLFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNCL vs. XLFI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNCL
XLFI

Financial Services

97.0%
100.4%

Technology

1.9%

-

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

FNCL
97.0%
XLFI
100.4%

Technology

FNCL
1.9%
XLFI

-

Real Estate

FNCL
0.7%
XLFI

-

Industrials

FNCL
0.2%
XLFI

-

Healthcare

FNCL
0.1%
XLFI

-

Communication Services

FNCL
0.0%
XLFI

-

Consumer Cyclical

FNCL
0.0%
XLFI

-

Basic Materials

FNCL

-

XLFI

-

Consumer Defensive

FNCL

-

XLFI

-

Energy

FNCL

-

XLFI

-

Utilities

FNCL

-

XLFI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNCL vs. XLFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNCL
FNCL Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FNCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCL Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCL Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

XLFI
XLFI Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XLFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLFI Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XLFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLFI Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNCL vs. XLFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNCLXLFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.15

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

0.80

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.94

2.26

-0.32

FNCL vs. XLFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCL Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is comparable to the XLFI Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCL and XLFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNCL vs. XLFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCL drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, which is greater than XLFI's maximum drawdown of -11.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCL and XLFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNCLXLFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.38%

-11.89%

-32.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.78%

-11.89%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-1.11%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

-3.02%

-3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.68%

4.22%

+1.46%

Volatility

FNCL vs. XLFI - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLFI) at 2.78%. This indicates that FNCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNCLXLFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

2.78%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.15%

9.08%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

11.88%

+3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.09%

11.85%

+7.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.28%

11.85%

+10.43%

FNCL vs. XLFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNCL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XLFI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNCL vs. XLFI - Dividend Comparison

FNCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than XLFI's 11.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNCL
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF
1.56%1.45%1.52%1.91%2.29%1.75%2.26%2.17%2.37%1.60%1.81%2.17%
XLFI
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
11.29%5.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FNCL and XLFI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNCL has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to XLFI (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNCL dropped -44.38% vs XLFI's -11.89%.

On 1-year performance, FNCL leads with 13.08% vs 11.31% for XLFI. On fees, FNCL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLFI has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FNCL has performed better with a 13.08% return vs 11.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNCL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLFI.

XLFI has the higher dividend yield at 11.29%, compared with 1.56% for FNCL.

FNCL is categorized as Financials Equities, while XLFI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FNCL and 0.35% for XLFI.

XLFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNCL and XLFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer