FNCL vs. TRUF
FNCL (Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF) and TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. FNCL is passively managed, while TRUF is actively managed. Their 0.98 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FNCL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUF.
Performance
FNCL vs. TRUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FNCL
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 7.40%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 13.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.64%
- 5Y*
- 11.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.78%
TRUF
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.49M | $8.37M | $7.85M | |
| $20.82K | $18.81K | $11.26K |
FNCL vs. TRUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF | 15.97% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 16.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNCL and TRUF is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNCL vs. TRUF — Risk / Return Rank
FNCL
TRUF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FNCL vs. TRUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) and VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNCL | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNCL vs. TRUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNCL drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, which is greater than TRUF's maximum drawdown of -3.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCL and TRUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNCL | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.38% | -3.24% | -41.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -1.04% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.85% | -1.05% | -5.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.68% | — | — |
Volatility
FNCL vs. TRUF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNCL | TRUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.00% | 13.53% | +1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 13.53% | +5.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 13.53% | +8.75% |
FNCL vs. TRUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNCL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TRUF's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FNCL vs. TRUF - Dividend Comparison
FNCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than TRUF's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF | 1.56% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 1.91% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.26% | 2.17% | 2.37% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 2.17% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, FNCL and TRUF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FNCL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNCL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for TRUF.
FNCL has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.36% for TRUF.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FNCL and 0.10% for TRUF.
Find the right allocation for FNCL and TRUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer