PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNCL vs. PSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNCL vs. PSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) and Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNCL achieves a -6.43% return, which is significantly higher than PSP's -13.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FNCL has outperformed PSP with an annualized return of 12.14%, while PSP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.53% annualized return.


FNCL

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
-6.43%
6M
-3.99%
1Y
2.36%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*
12.14%

PSP

1D
-4.75%
1M
-5.00%
YTD
-13.50%
6M
-10.48%
1Y
-7.74%
3Y*
10.19%
5Y*
-0.12%
10Y*
7.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNCL vs. PSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNCL
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF
-6.43%14.94%30.44%14.10%-12.28%34.92%-2.19%31.59%-13.44%19.99%
PSP
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF
-13.50%6.49%17.42%37.72%-37.37%27.30%12.47%35.73%-15.12%24.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FNCL and PSP is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.70

The correlation between FNCL and PSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNCL vs. PSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNCL
PSP

Financial Services

96.9%
90.7%

Technology

2.1%
0.1%

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Industrials

0.2%
3.2%

Healthcare

0.0%
0.5%

Communication Services

0.0%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.4%

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

FNCL
96.9%
PSP
90.7%

Technology

FNCL
2.1%
PSP
0.1%

Real Estate

FNCL
0.7%
PSP

-

Industrials

FNCL
0.2%
PSP
3.2%

Healthcare

FNCL
0.0%
PSP
0.5%

Communication Services

FNCL
0.0%
PSP
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FNCL
0.0%
PSP

-

Basic Materials

FNCL

-

PSP
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

FNCL

-

PSP
5.4%

Energy

FNCL

-

PSP

-

Utilities

FNCL

-

PSP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNCL vs. PSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNCL
FNCL Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FNCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCL Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCL Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

PSP
PSP Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSP Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNCL vs. PSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) and Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNCLPSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.95

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

-0.35

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

-0.80

+1.23

FNCL vs. PSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCL Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is higher than the PSP Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCL and PSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNCLPSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

-0.39

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

-0.01

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.34

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.08

+0.45

Drawdowns

FNCL vs. PSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCL drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, smaller than the maximum PSP drawdown of -85.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCL and PSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNCLPSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.38%

-85.40%

+41.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.78%

-22.37%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

-22.94%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.68%

-47.16%

+21.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

-47.16%

+2.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.28%

-17.72%

+8.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.90%

-30.69%

+23.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

9.67%

-4.11%

Volatility

FNCL vs. PSP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) is 3.26%, while Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) has a volatility of 6.89%. This indicates that FNCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNCLPSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

6.89%

-3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

16.20%

-5.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.76%

19.91%

-5.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

23.79%

-4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.34%

22.45%

-0.11%

FNCL vs. PSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNCL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PSP's 1.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNCL vs. PSP - Dividend Comparison

FNCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than PSP's 6.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNCL
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF
1.70%1.45%1.52%1.91%2.29%1.75%2.26%2.17%2.37%1.60%1.81%2.17%
PSP
Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF
6.68%5.87%8.62%3.96%2.88%10.34%4.66%5.87%6.81%10.18%4.12%6.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNCL and PSP have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSP has higher volatility (6.89%) compared to FNCL (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNCL dropped -44.38% vs PSP's -85.40%.

On 10-year performance, FNCL leads with 12.14% vs 7.53% for PSP. On fees, FNCL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FNCL has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNCL has performed better with a 12.14% return vs 7.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNCL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.

PSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.68%, compared with 1.70% for FNCL.

FNCL is categorized as Financials Equities, while PSP is Global Equities. FNCL tracks MSCI USA IMI Financials Index, while PSP tracks Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FNCL and 1.44% for PSP.

FNCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNCL and PSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer