FNCL vs. FSLBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) and Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX).
FNCL is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Financials Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. FSLBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 29, 1985.
Performance
FNCL vs. FSLBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNCL vs. FSLBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF | -9.17% | 14.94% | 30.44% | 14.10% | -12.28% | 34.92% | -2.19% | 31.59% | -13.44% | 19.99% |
FSLBX Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio | -18.16% | 5.78% | 35.74% | 27.77% | -17.54% | 40.61% | 22.66% | 31.60% | -15.37% | 27.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNCL achieves a -9.17% return, which is significantly higher than FSLBX's -18.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FNCL has underperformed FSLBX with an annualized return of 12.25%, while FSLBX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.24% annualized return.
FNCL
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- -9.17%
- 6M
- -7.18%
- 1Y
- 2.69%
- 3Y*
- 17.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
FSLBX
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- -18.16%
- 6M
- -20.14%
- 1Y
- -6.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNCL vs. FSLBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNCL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FSLBX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FNCL vs. FSLBX — Risk / Return Rank
FNCL
FSLBX
FNCL vs. FSLBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) and Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNCL | FSLBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.14 | -0.24 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.32 | -0.16 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.98 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | -0.35 | +0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.79 | -0.93 | +1.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNCL | FSLBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | -0.24 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.42 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.56 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.44 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNCL and FSLBX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FNCL vs. FSLBX - Dividend Comparison
FNCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than FSLBX's 0.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF | 1.75% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 1.91% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.26% | 2.17% | 2.37% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 2.17% |
FSLBX Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.69% | 1.22% | 2.09% | 1.39% | 3.08% | 4.25% | 8.94% | 5.46% | 1.25% | 6.37% |
Drawdowns
FNCL vs. FSLBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNCL drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, smaller than the maximum FSLBX drawdown of -68.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCL and FSLBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNCL | FSLBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.38% | -68.20% | +23.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.78% | -24.67% | +9.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.68% | -30.87% | +5.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.38% | -40.56% | -3.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.94% | -23.61% | +11.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.89% | -14.86% | +7.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 9.25% | -4.33% |
Volatility
FNCL vs. FSLBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) is 4.88%, while Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that FNCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSLBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNCL | FSLBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 6.18% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.75% | 17.15% | -5.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.02% | 27.03% | -7.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 22.76% | -3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 23.67% | -1.32% |