FNBGX vs. FIPDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX) and Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX).
FNBGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 20, 2005. FIPDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 16, 2012.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNBGX or FIPDX.
Key characteristics
| FNBGX | FIPDX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -4.45% | 2.44% |
| 1Y Return | 5.06% | 5.56% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -11.22% | -2.32% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -5.62% | 1.54% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.36 | 1.16 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.60 | 1.72 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.07 | 1.21 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.11 | 0.45 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.90 | 5.14 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.36% | 1.08% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.63% | 4.86% |
| Max Drawdown | -47.77% | -14.29% |
| Current Drawdown | -40.51% | -7.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNBGX and FIPDX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FNBGX vs. FIPDX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FNBGX achieves a -4.45% return, which is significantly lower than FIPDX's 2.44% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNBGX vs. FIPDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNBGX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FIPDX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNBGX vs. FIPDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX) and Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNBGX vs. FIPDX - Dividend Comparison
FNBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than FIPDX's 5.50% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNBGX Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.64% | 3.20% | 3.00% | 2.05% | 2.13% | 2.64% | 2.95% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FIPDX Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 5.50% | 3.59% | 8.87% | 4.76% | 0.24% | 0.41% | 0.39% | 0.09% | 0.08% | 0.11% | 1.10% | 0.66% |
Drawdowns
FNBGX vs. FIPDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNBGX drawdown since its inception was -47.77%, which is greater than FIPDX's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNBGX and FIPDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNBGX vs. FIPDX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) at 1.30%. This indicates that FNBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIPDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.