PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMUB vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMUB vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMUB achieves a 2.00% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.


FMUB

1D
0.11%
1M
0.88%
YTD
2.00%
6M
2.22%
1Y
7.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UGA

1D
-2.73%
1M
-12.25%
YTD
70.69%
6M
59.72%
1Y
79.48%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMUB vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FMUB and UGA is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025

-0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMUB vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMUB
FMUB Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMUB vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMUBUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.37

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

5.37

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.34

12.86

-0.52

FMUB vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMUB Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMUB and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMUBUGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

2.27

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.33

0.12

+2.21

Drawdowns

FMUB vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMUB drawdown since its inception was -2.49%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMUB and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMUBUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

-86.59%

+84.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-14.88%

+12.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-14.75%

+14.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.38%

-36.76%

+36.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

6.20%

-5.57%

Volatility

FMUB vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB) is 0.87%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that FMUB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMUBUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

11.64%

-10.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.99%

30.48%

-28.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66%

35.27%

-32.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.25%

34.40%

-31.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.25%

37.27%

-34.02%

FMUB vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMUB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMUB vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

FMUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


FMUB and UGA have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to FMUB (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMUB dropped -2.49% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 79.48% vs 7.69% for FMUB. On fees, FMUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FMUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 79.48% return vs 7.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

FMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

FMUB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FMUB and 0.75% for UGA.

FMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMUB and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer