PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMUAX vs. AYBLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMUAX vs. AYBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMUAX achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly lower than AYBLX's 12.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FMUAX has underperformed AYBLX with an annualized return of 5.95%, while AYBLX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.99% annualized return.


FMUAX

1D
0.60%
1M
-0.69%
6M
4.11%
YTD
5.65%
1Y
12.97%
3Y*
9.05%
5Y*
4.63%
10Y*
5.95%
ALL TIME*
6.01%

AYBLX

1D
0.92%
1M
-1.73%
6M
9.12%
YTD
12.02%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
9.99%
ALL TIME*
7.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FMUAX vs. AYBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMUAX
Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund
5.65%9.00%8.70%9.81%-10.68%10.32%8.48%15.16%-5.24%11.09%
AYBLX
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund
12.02%19.80%9.64%15.41%-14.39%15.48%12.92%22.22%-4.43%15.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FMUAX and AYBLX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2003

0.87

The correlation between FMUAX and AYBLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.87 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMUAX vs. AYBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMUAX
FMUAX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FMUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

AYBLX
AYBLX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
AYBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AYBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AYBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AYBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AYBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMUAX vs. AYBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMUAXAYBLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.93

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.09

16.91

-1.82

FMUAX vs. AYBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMUAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the AYBLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMUAX and AYBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMUAX vs. AYBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMUAX drawdown since its inception was -22.43%, smaller than the maximum AYBLX drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMUAX and AYBLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMUAXAYBLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.43%

-36.28%

+13.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.94%

-6.41%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.18%

-13.39%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.93%

-20.26%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.46%

-24.24%

+2.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-2.40%

+1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-3.77%

+1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.49%

-0.52%

Volatility

FMUAX vs. AYBLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX) is 1.68%, while Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX) has a volatility of 2.35%. This indicates that FMUAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AYBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMUAXAYBLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

2.35%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.95%

7.97%

-3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.38%

10.14%

-3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.21%

11.15%

-3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.14%

11.33%

-3.19%

FMUAX vs. AYBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMUAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than AYBLX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMUAX vs. AYBLX - Dividend Comparison

FMUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than AYBLX's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AYBLX
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund
3.30%3.58%2.59%1.76%3.23%8.61%4.12%6.03%9.97%9.42%2.63%4.14%
FMUAX
Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund
1.30%1.23%2.01%2.53%2.25%4.56%2.12%4.00%7.98%2.17%2.36%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMUAX and AYBLX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AYBLX has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to FMUAX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMUAX dropped -22.43% vs AYBLX's -36.28%.

AYBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMUAX and AYBLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer