FMTL vs. TDIV
FMTL (First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF) and TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FMTL is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Critical Metals Index, while TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMTL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDIV.
Performance
FMTL vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMTL achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 21.15% return.
FMTL
- 1D
- -7.48%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- 19.55%
- 6M
- 28.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDIV
- 1D
- -5.89%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 21.15%
- 6M
- 17.77%
- 1Y
- 41.71%
- 3Y*
- 30.32%
- 5Y*
- 17.52%
- 10Y*
- 18.38%
FMTL vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF | 19.55% | 21.20% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 21.15% | -2.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMTL and TDIV is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMTL vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank
FMTL
TDIV
FMTL vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMTL | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.25 | 0.84 | +1.41 |
Drawdowns
FMTL vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, smaller than the maximum TDIV drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTL and TDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMTL | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.44% | -31.97% | +9.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.37% | -8.88% | -1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -4.84% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.49% | — |
Volatility
FMTL vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMTL | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.29% | 19.46% | +20.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.29% | 20.84% | +19.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.29% | 20.94% | +19.35% |
FMTL vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMTL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMTL vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison
FMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than TDIV's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 1.20% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.74% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 2.07% | 2.27% | 2.97% | 2.27% | 2.45% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMTL and TDIV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FMTL.
TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.05% for FMTL.
FMTL is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while TDIV is Technology Equities. FMTL tracks Indxx Global Critical Metals Index, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FMTL and 0.50% for TDIV.
Find the right allocation for FMTL and TDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer