PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMOTX vs. FASEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMOTX vs. FASEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund (FMOTX) and Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMOTX achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than FASEX's 15.64% return. Over the past 10 years, FMOTX has underperformed FASEX with an annualized return of 2.10%, while FASEX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.78% annualized return.


FMOTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.79%
1Y
6.91%
3Y*
3.54%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
2.10%

FASEX

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.37%
YTD
15.64%
6M
17.05%
1Y
29.61%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
10.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMOTX vs. FASEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMOTX
Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund
1.39%3.09%2.02%6.20%-8.88%2.15%4.33%7.53%1.13%5.12%
FASEX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund
15.64%9.68%10.40%14.20%-10.63%34.84%1.19%26.68%-13.00%19.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FMOTX and FASEX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1987

-0.02

The correlation between FMOTX and FASEX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMOTX vs. FASEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMOTX
FMOTX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FMOTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMOTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMOTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FMOTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMOTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FASEX
FASEX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FASEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FASEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMOTX vs. FASEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund (FMOTX) and Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMOTXFASEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.59

2.19

+0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.12

3.10

+1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.38

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

4.06

-1.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.59

14.86

-5.27

FMOTX vs. FASEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMOTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the FASEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMOTX and FASEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMOTXFASEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.19

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.50

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.54

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.52

+0.65

Drawdowns

FMOTX vs. FASEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMOTX drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum FASEX drawdown of -55.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMOTX and FASEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMOTXFASEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.87%

-55.57%

+40.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.27%

-7.37%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.29%

-22.26%

+15.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.40%

-22.26%

+7.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.40%

-44.56%

+30.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.84%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.82%

-8.93%

+7.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

2.01%

-1.30%

Volatility

FMOTX vs. FASEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund (FMOTX) is 1.04%, while Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that FMOTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMOTXFASEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

3.96%

-2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.85%

10.14%

-8.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57%

13.69%

-11.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.07%

18.06%

-13.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.99%

20.21%

-16.22%

FMOTX vs. FASEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMOTX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FASEX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMOTX vs. FASEX - Dividend Comparison

FMOTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than FASEX's 12.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASEX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund
12.69%14.67%5.29%3.12%6.32%4.02%1.06%0.89%4.48%7.93%3.67%3.49%
FMOTX
Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund
3.23%3.47%3.44%3.16%2.84%2.39%2.74%3.43%3.35%3.29%3.56%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMOTX and FASEX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASEX has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to FMOTX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMOTX dropped -14.87% vs FASEX's -55.57%.

FMOTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMOTX and FASEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer