FMOTX vs. NSBRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund (FMOTX) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX).
FMOTX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Aug 2, 1987. NSBRX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Mar 28, 2006.
Performance
FMOTX vs. NSBRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FMOTX vs. NSBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMOTX Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund | 0.12% | 3.09% | 2.02% | 6.20% | -8.88% | 2.15% | 4.33% | 7.53% | 1.13% | 5.12% |
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | -2.40% | 10.03% | 17.56% | 15.08% | -9.63% | 27.17% | 9.79% | 41.88% | -4.36% | 20.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMOTX achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly higher than NSBRX's -2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FMOTX has underperformed NSBRX with an annualized return of 2.11%, while NSBRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.
FMOTX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 3.52%
- 3Y*
- 2.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- 2.11%
NSBRX
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -5.23%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.56%
- 1Y
- 8.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FMOTX vs. NSBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMOTX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NSBRX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FMOTX vs. NSBRX — Risk / Return Rank
FMOTX
NSBRX
FMOTX vs. NSBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund (FMOTX) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMOTX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.61 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 0.97 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.14 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 0.82 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 3.53 | -0.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMOTX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.61 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.66 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.75 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.58 | +0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between FMOTX and NSBRX is -0.09. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
FMOTX vs. NSBRX - Dividend Comparison
FMOTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than NSBRX's 9.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMOTX Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund | 3.54% | 3.47% | 3.44% | 3.16% | 2.84% | 2.39% | 2.74% | 3.43% | 3.35% | 3.29% | 3.56% | 3.64% |
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | 9.19% | 9.26% | 6.82% | 3.01% | 3.58% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 15.68% | 7.04% | 4.57% | 1.75% | 6.24% |
Drawdowns
FMOTX vs. NSBRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMOTX drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum NSBRX drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMOTX and NSBRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMOTX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -45.14% | +30.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.98% | -10.75% | +5.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.40% | -19.79% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.40% | -33.69% | +19.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -6.10% | +4.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -5.28% | +3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 2.50% | -0.78% |
Volatility
FMOTX vs. NSBRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund (FMOTX) is 1.11%, while Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that FMOTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NSBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FMOTX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 4.11% | -3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.58% | 7.73% | -6.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.95% | 15.14% | -10.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.05% | 14.29% | -10.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.98% | 16.59% | -12.61% |