FMOTX vs. NSBRX
FMOTX (Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund) and NSBRX (Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FMOTX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Nuveen, while NSBRX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Nuveen. Over the past 10 years, FMOTX returned 2.00%/yr vs 12.88%/yr for NSBRX. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. FMOTX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for NSBRX.
Performance
FMOTX vs. NSBRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FMOTX having a 1.68% return and NSBRX slightly higher at 1.69%. Over the past 10 years, FMOTX has underperformed NSBRX with an annualized return of 2.00%, while NSBRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.88% annualized return.
FMOTX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 6.58%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- 2.00%
NSBRX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 9.08%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- 12.88%
FMOTX vs. NSBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMOTX Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund | 1.68% | 3.09% | 2.02% | 6.20% | -8.88% | 2.15% | 4.33% | 7.53% | 1.13% | 5.12% |
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | 1.69% | 10.03% | 17.56% | 15.08% | -9.63% | 27.17% | 9.79% | 41.88% | -4.36% | 20.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMOTX and NSBRX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2006 | -0.08 |
The correlation between FMOTX and NSBRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMOTX vs. NSBRX — Risk / Return Rank
FMOTX
NSBRX
FMOTX vs. NSBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund (FMOTX) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FMOTX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.18 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 1.29 | +1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | 4.51 | +5.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FMOTX vs. NSBRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMOTX drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum NSBRX drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMOTX and NSBRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMOTX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -45.14% | +30.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.27% | -7.80% | +5.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.29% | -14.89% | +8.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.40% | -19.79% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.40% | -33.69% | +19.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -2.16% | +2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.81% | -5.25% | +3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 2.22% | -1.51% |
Volatility
FMOTX vs. NSBRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund (FMOTX) is 0.73%, while Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that FMOTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NSBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMOTX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 3.09% | -2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.83% | 7.76% | -5.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52% | 10.04% | -7.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.07% | 14.29% | -10.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 16.61% | -12.62% |
FMOTX vs. NSBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMOTX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NSBRX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMOTX vs. NSBRX - Dividend Comparison
FMOTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than NSBRX's 11.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMOTX Nuveen Missouri Municipal Bond Fund | 3.23% | 3.47% | 3.44% | 3.16% | 2.84% | 2.39% | 2.74% | 3.43% | 3.35% | 3.29% | 3.56% | 3.64% |
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | 11.88% | 9.26% | 6.82% | 3.01% | 3.58% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 15.68% | 7.04% | 4.57% | 1.75% | 6.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMOTX and NSBRX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NSBRX has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to FMOTX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMOTX dropped -14.87% vs NSBRX's -45.14%.
FMOTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMOTX and NSBRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer