FMKT vs. CNAV
FMKT (The Free Markets ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMKT charges 0.76%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.
Performance
FMKT vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMKT achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 47.26% return.
FMKT
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNAV
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 21.60%
- YTD
- 47.26%
- 6M
- 48.02%
- 1Y
- 72.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMKT vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FMKT The Free Markets ETF | 2.65% | 10.93% |
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF | 47.26% | 18.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMKT and CNAV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMKT vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank
FMKT
CNAV
FMKT vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Free Markets ETF (FMKT) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMKT | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 1.62 | -0.89 |
Drawdowns
FMKT vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMKT drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMKT and CNAV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMKT | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.79% | -30.06% | +12.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.86% | 0.00% | -6.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -5.42% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.02% | — |
Volatility
FMKT vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMKT | CNAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.59% | 25.08% | -5.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 27.16% | -7.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 27.16% | -7.57% |
FMKT vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMKT has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMKT vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison
FMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FMKT The Free Markets ETF | 2.10% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMKT and CNAV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FMKT is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FMKT is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.
FMKT has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.
Their fees differ too: 0.76% for FMKT and 1.31% for CNAV.
Find the right allocation for FMKT and CNAV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer