FMIL vs. NFXS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FMIL (Fidelity New Millennium ETF) and NFXS (Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - FMIL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while NFXS is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FMIL returned 24.45% vs 64.26% for NFXS. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. FMIL charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for NFXS.

Performance

FMIL vs. NFXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMIL achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly lower than NFXS's 24.21% return.

FMIL

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 9.17%
• 6M: 8.34%
• 1Y: 24.45%
• 3Y*: 22.21%
• 5Y*: 16.06%
• 10Y*: —

NFXS

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 21.28%
• YTD: 24.21%
• 6M: 24.00%
• 1Y: 64.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMIL vs. NFXS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF	9.17%	17.67%	1.52%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	24.21%	-8.56%	-21.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FMIL and NFXS is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	-0.33

The correlation between FMIL and NFXS shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (all time) to -0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FMIL vs. NFXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMIL

FMIL Risk / Return Rank: 57
FMIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FMIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FMIL Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FMIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FMIL Martin Ratio Rank: 64

NFXS

NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 55
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 68
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMIL vs. NFXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMIL	NFXS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.91	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	2.55	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.36	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	2.06	+0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.96	5.64	+5.32

FMIL vs. NFXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the NFXS Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMIL and NFXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FMIL vs. NFXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMIL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum NFXS drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIL and NFXS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMIL	NFXS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.72%	-50.37%	+30.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.98%	-31.31%	+21.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.37%	-12.88%	+10.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.98%	-31.93%	+28.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	11.45%	-9.21%

Volatility

FMIL vs. NFXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) is 5.32%, while Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) has a volatility of 7.74%. This indicates that FMIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMIL	NFXS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.32%	7.74%	-2.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.71%	26.22%	-15.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.56%	33.81%	-20.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.00%	34.65%	-17.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.69%	34.65%	-16.96%

FMIL vs. NFXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMIL has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than NFXS's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMIL vs. NFXS - Dividend Comparison

FMIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than NFXS's 3.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF	1.01%	1.10%	0.82%	0.57%	1.67%	1.68%	0.89%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	3.23%	3.53%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMIL and NFXS in my portfolio?

FMIL and NFXS have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMIL or NFXS?

NFXS has higher volatility (7.74%) compared to FMIL (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMIL dropped -19.72% vs NFXS's -50.37%.

Which ETF is better, FMIL or NFXS?

On 1-year performance, NFXS leads with 64.26% vs 24.45% for FMIL. On fees, FMIL is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FMIL has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FMIL or NFXS?

Over the 1-year period, NFXS has performed better with a 64.26% return vs 24.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMIL or NFXS?

FMIL is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for NFXS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMIL or NFXS?

NFXS has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 1.01% for FMIL.

What is the main difference between FMIL and NFXS?

FMIL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while NFXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FMIL and 1.03% for NFXS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NFXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.