PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMIL vs. FUTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMIL vs. FUTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMIL achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly higher than FUTY's 4.95% return.


FMIL

1D
1.80%
1M
2.12%
6M
9.47%
YTD
12.63%
1Y
22.64%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
16.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.49%

FUTY

1D
0.16%
1M
-3.05%
6M
4.93%
YTD
4.95%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
14.77%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
9.00%
ALL TIME*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.28M$5.36M$5.21M
$19.54M$18.60M$19.06M

FMIL vs. FUTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FMIL
Fidelity New Millennium ETF
12.63%17.67%27.89%25.07%-0.04%24.53%19.50%
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
4.95%16.40%23.20%-7.46%1.12%17.53%4.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FMIL and FUTY is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.36

The correlation between FMIL and FUTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FMIL vs. FUTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FMIL
FUTY

Technology

31.3%

-

Financial Services

12.3%

-

Industrials

11.8%
0.2%

Communication Services

10.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.9%

-

Energy

4.6%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%

-

Basic Materials

2.1%

-

Utilities

1.4%
99.3%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Technology

FMIL
31.3%
FUTY

-

Financial Services

FMIL
12.3%
FUTY

-

Industrials

FMIL
11.8%
FUTY
0.2%

Communication Services

FMIL
10.3%
FUTY

-

Consumer Cyclical

FMIL
10.1%
FUTY

-

Healthcare

FMIL
8.9%
FUTY

-

Energy

FMIL
4.6%
FUTY
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

FMIL
4.0%
FUTY

-

Basic Materials

FMIL
2.1%
FUTY

-

Utilities

FMIL
1.4%
FUTY
99.3%

Real Estate

FMIL
1.1%
FUTY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMIL vs. FUTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMIL
FMIL Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FMIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMIL Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FMIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMIL Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FUTY
FUTY Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FUTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMIL vs. FUTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMILFUTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.08

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

0.70

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.91

1.44

+8.47

FMIL vs. FUTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the FUTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMIL and FUTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMIL vs. FUTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMIL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum FUTY drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIL and FUTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMILFUTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-36.44%

+16.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.98%

-8.93%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.72%

-12.96%

-6.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

-25.11%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.67%

+5.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-6.00%

+3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

4.35%

-2.06%

Volatility

FMIL vs. FUTY - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) have volatilities of 4.00% and 3.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMILFUTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

3.86%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.07%

11.84%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.84%

14.76%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

17.09%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.61%

19.09%

-1.48%

FMIL vs. FUTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMIL has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTY's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMIL vs. FUTY - Dividend Comparison

FMIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than FUTY's 2.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMIL
Fidelity New Millennium ETF
0.97%1.10%0.82%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
2.64%2.67%2.96%3.31%2.72%2.70%3.07%2.82%3.11%3.03%3.35%4.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMIL and FUTY have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMIL has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to FUTY (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMIL dropped -19.72% vs FUTY's -36.44%.

On 5-year performance, FMIL leads with 16.98% vs 8.93% for FUTY. On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FUTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FMIL has performed better with a 16.98% return vs 8.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FMIL.

FUTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 0.97% for FMIL.

FMIL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FUTY is Utilities Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FMIL and 0.08% for FUTY.

FMIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMIL and FUTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer