FMIL vs. FUTY
FMIL (Fidelity New Millennium ETF) and FUTY (Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FMIL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FUTY is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index. FMIL is actively managed, while FUTY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FMIL returned 16.04%/yr vs 9.26%/yr for FUTY. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FMIL charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FUTY.
Performance
FMIL vs. FUTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMIL achieves a 11.16% return, which is significantly higher than FUTY's 3.78% return.
FMIL
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 11.16%
- 6M
- 11.77%
- 1Y
- 27.80%
- 3Y*
- 23.70%
- 5Y*
- 16.04%
- 10Y*
- —
FUTY
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- YTD
- 3.78%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 12.10%
- 3Y*
- 13.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.10%
FMIL vs. FUTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF | 11.16% | 17.67% | 27.89% | 25.07% | -0.04% | 24.53% | 18.76% |
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 3.78% | 16.40% | 23.20% | -7.46% | 1.12% | 17.53% | 6.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMIL and FUTY is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020 | 0.38 |
The correlation between FMIL and FUTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FMIL vs. FUTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FMIL
FUTY
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
FMIL
FUTY
-
Communication Services
FMIL
FUTY
-
Financial Services
FMIL
FUTY
-
Industrials
FMIL
FUTY
Consumer Cyclical
FMIL
FUTY
-
Healthcare
FMIL
FUTY
-
Consumer Defensive
FMIL
FUTY
-
Energy
FMIL
FUTY
Utilities
FMIL
FUTY
Basic Materials
FMIL
FUTY
-
Real Estate
FMIL
FUTY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMIL vs. FUTY — Risk / Return Rank
FMIL
FUTY
FMIL vs. FUTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMIL | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.15 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 1.36 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.68 | 3.05 | +9.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMIL | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 0.85 | +1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.54 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.55 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
FMIL vs. FUTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMIL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum FUTY drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIL and FUTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMIL | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.72% | -36.44% | +16.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.98% | -8.93% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.72% | -17.35% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.72% | -25.11% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.72% | +6.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -6.03% | +3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 3.98% | -1.78% |
Volatility
FMIL vs. FUTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) is 3.15%, while Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) has a volatility of 5.52%. This indicates that FMIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMIL | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 5.52% | -2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.75% | 11.38% | -1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.82% | 14.34% | -1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 17.08% | -0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 19.05% | -1.41% |
FMIL vs. FUTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMIL has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTY's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMIL vs. FUTY - Dividend Comparison
FMIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than FUTY's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF | 0.99% | 1.10% | 0.82% | 0.57% | 1.67% | 1.68% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 2.60% | 2.67% | 2.96% | 3.31% | 2.72% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 2.82% | 3.11% | 3.03% | 3.35% | 4.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMIL and FUTY have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUTY has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to FMIL (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMIL dropped -19.72% vs FUTY's -36.44%.
On 5-year performance, FMIL leads with 16.04% vs 9.26% for FUTY. On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FMIL has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FMIL has performed better with a 16.04% return vs 9.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FMIL.
FUTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.99% for FMIL.
FMIL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FUTY is Utilities Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FMIL and 0.08% for FUTY.
FMIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMIL and FUTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer