FMIL vs. FMILX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FMIL (Fidelity New Millennium ETF) and FMILX (Fidelity New Millennium Fund) are both funds - FMIL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FMILX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FMIL returned 15.85%/yr vs 15.36%/yr for FMILX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.

Performance

FMIL vs. FMILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMIL achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly lower than FMILX's 12.72% return.

FMIL

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 3.15%
• YTD: 10.26%
• 6M: 11.18%
• 1Y: 26.96%
• 3Y*: 23.20%
• 5Y*: 15.85%
• 10Y*: —

FMILX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 5.76%
• YTD: 12.72%
• 6M: 9.36%
• 1Y: 24.46%
• 3Y*: 22.76%
• 5Y*: 15.36%
• 10Y*: 15.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMIL vs. FMILX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF	10.26%	17.67%	27.89%	25.07%	-0.04%	24.53%	18.76%
FMILX Fidelity New Millennium Fund	12.72%	12.97%	28.83%	25.37%	-1.56%	23.92%	19.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FMIL and FMILX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020	0.97

The correlation between FMIL and FMILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FMIL vs. FMILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMIL

FMIL Risk / Return Rank: 61
FMIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FMIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FMIL Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FMIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FMIL Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FMILX

FMILX Risk / Return Rank: 36
FMILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FMILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FMILX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FMILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FMILX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMIL vs. FMILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FMIL	FMILX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	1.80	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	2.37	+0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.34	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	2.16	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.30	7.83	+4.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FMIL vs. FMILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMIL Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the FMILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMIL and FMILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FMIL	FMILX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	1.80	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	0.91	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.17	0.63	+0.54

Drawdowns

FMIL vs. FMILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMIL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum FMILX drawdown of -58.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIL and FMILX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMIL	FMILX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.72%	-58.56%	+38.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.98%	-11.86%	+1.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.72%	-20.48%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.72%	-20.48%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	0.00%	-0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.99%	-12.45%	+9.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	3.26%	-1.06%

Volatility

FMIL vs. FMILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) is 3.15%, while Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that FMIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMIL	FMILX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.15%	3.62%	-0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.73%	11.68%	-1.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.80%	14.24%	-1.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.92%	16.89%	+0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.65%	18.02%	-0.37%

FMIL vs. FMILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FMIL and FMILX have an expense ratio of 0.59%.

Dividends

FMIL vs. FMILX - Dividend Comparison

FMIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while FMILX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF	1.00%	1.10%	0.82%	0.57%	1.67%	1.68%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FMILX Fidelity New Millennium Fund	0.00%	0.00%	3.64%	3.87%	4.19%	8.25%	8.60%	4.72%	18.25%	7.84%	6.65%	11.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMIL and FMILX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FMIL and FMILX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FMIL or FMILX?

FMILX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to FMIL (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMIL dropped -19.72% vs FMILX's -58.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.