FMIL vs. FGRTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FMIL (Fidelity New Millennium ETF) and FGRTX (Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FMIL returned 15.85%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for FGRTX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FMIL charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FGRTX.

Performance

FMIL vs. FGRTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FMIL having a 10.26% return and FGRTX slightly higher at 10.50%.

FMIL

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 3.15%
• YTD: 10.26%
• 6M: 11.18%
• 1Y: 26.96%
• 3Y*: 23.20%
• 5Y*: 15.85%
• 10Y*: —

FGRTX

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 3.41%
• YTD: 10.50%
• 6M: 12.42%
• 1Y: 31.38%
• 3Y*: 25.59%
• 5Y*: 16.32%
• 10Y*: 16.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMIL vs. FGRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF	10.26%	17.67%	27.89%	25.07%	-0.04%	24.53%	18.76%
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund	10.50%	26.92%	25.98%	26.51%	-8.98%	26.29%	22.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FMIL and FGRTX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020	0.95

The correlation between FMIL and FGRTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FMIL vs. FGRTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMIL

FMIL Risk / Return Rank: 61
FMIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FMIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FMIL Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FMIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FMIL Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FGRTX

FGRTX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FGRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FGRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FGRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FGRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FGRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMIL vs. FGRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FMIL	FGRTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	2.70	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	3.70	-0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.49	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	3.59	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.30	16.31	-4.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FMIL vs. FGRTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMIL Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the FGRTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMIL and FGRTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FMIL	FGRTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	2.70	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	0.98	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.17	0.48	+0.69

Drawdowns

FMIL vs. FGRTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMIL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum FGRTX drawdown of -56.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIL and FGRTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMIL	FGRTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.72%	-56.17%	+36.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.98%	-8.99%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.72%	-18.51%	-1.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.72%	-23.35%	+3.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-0.32%	-0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.99%	-8.72%	+5.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	1.98%	+0.22%

Volatility

FMIL vs. FGRTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) at 2.71%. This indicates that FMIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGRTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMIL	FGRTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.15%	2.71%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.73%	9.06%	+0.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.80%	11.98%	+0.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.92%	16.70%	+0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.65%	18.12%	-0.47%

FMIL vs. FGRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMIL has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FGRTX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMIL vs. FGRTX - Dividend Comparison

FMIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than FGRTX's 3.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund	3.52%	3.89%	2.68%	2.06%	4.38%	4.79%	7.96%	12.98%	21.72%	15.57%	1.97%	4.16%
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF	1.00%	1.10%	0.82%	0.57%	1.67%	1.68%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMIL and FGRTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FMIL and FGRTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FMIL or FGRTX?

FMIL has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to FGRTX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMIL dropped -19.72% vs FGRTX's -56.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.