FMIL vs. FETH
FMIL (Fidelity New Millennium ETF) and FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FMIL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FETH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. FMIL is actively managed, while FETH is passively managed. Over the past year, FMIL returned 21.32% vs -37.69% for FETH. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FMIL charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FETH.
Performance
FMIL vs. FETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMIL achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -36.85% return.
FMIL
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 9.08%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 1Y
- 21.32%
- 3Y*
- 21.58%
- 5Y*
- 16.90%
- 10Y*
- —
FETH
- 1D
- 5.89%
- 1M
- 12.79%
- 6M
- -41.51%
- YTD
- -36.85%
- 1Y
- -37.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMIL vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF | 11.52% | 17.67% | 5.21% |
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | -36.85% | -11.37% | -4.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMIL and FETH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMIL vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank
FMIL
FETH
FMIL vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FMIL | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.94 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | -0.56 | +2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.45 | -0.87 | +10.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FMIL vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMIL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -67.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIL and FETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMIL | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.72% | -67.94% | +48.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.98% | -67.94% | +57.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -61.36% | +60.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.96% | -34.57% | +31.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 43.30% | -41.04% |
Volatility
FMIL vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity New Millennium ETF (FMIL) is 4.37%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 16.77%. This indicates that FMIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMIL | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 16.77% | -12.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.83% | 47.34% | -36.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 68.43% | -54.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 71.91% | -54.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 71.91% | -54.27% |
FMIL vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMIL has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMIL vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison
FMIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FMIL Fidelity New Millennium ETF | 0.98% | 1.10% | 0.82% | 0.57% | 1.67% | 1.68% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMIL and FETH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FETH has higher volatility (16.77%) compared to FMIL (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMIL dropped -19.72% vs FETH's -67.94%.
On 1-year performance, FMIL leads with 21.32% vs -37.69% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FMIL has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FMIL has performed better with a 21.32% return vs -37.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FMIL.
FMIL has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.
FMIL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FMIL and 0.25% for FETH.
FMIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMIL and FETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer