PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMHTX vs. DNYMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMHTX vs. DNYMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund (FMHTX) and DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMHTX achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly higher than DNYMX's 0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, FMHTX has outperformed DNYMX with an annualized return of 2.06%, while DNYMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.34% annualized return.


FMHTX

1D
0.26%
1M
0.77%
YTD
1.38%
6M
1.90%
1Y
7.10%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
0.89%
10Y*
2.06%

DNYMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.98%
6M
1.21%
1Y
2.99%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
1.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMHTX vs. DNYMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMHTX
Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund
1.38%5.34%1.98%6.00%-9.88%1.19%4.91%7.16%0.90%5.58%
DNYMX
DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio
0.98%2.69%2.87%2.76%-1.17%-0.10%1.26%2.42%1.02%1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FMHTX and DNYMX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between FMHTX and DNYMX has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMHTX vs. DNYMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMHTX
FMHTX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FMHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FMHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

DNYMX
DNYMX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DNYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
DNYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMHTX vs. DNYMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund (FMHTX) and DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMHTXDNYMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

4.18

-2.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

12.55

-9.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.12

56.41

-47.28

FMHTX vs. DNYMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMHTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is lower than the DNYMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMHTX and DNYMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMHTXDNYMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

4.63

-1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

1.82

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

1.28

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

1.33

-0.20

Drawdowns

FMHTX vs. DNYMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMHTX drawdown since its inception was -22.17%, which is greater than DNYMX's maximum drawdown of -3.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMHTX and DNYMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMHTXDNYMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.17%

-3.19%

-18.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-0.24%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.72%

-0.98%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.36%

-2.53%

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.36%

-3.19%

-11.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

0.00%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-0.42%

-1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.05%

+0.73%

Volatility

FMHTX vs. DNYMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund (FMHTX) has a higher volatility of 1.11% compared to DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) at 0.20%. This indicates that FMHTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNYMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMHTXDNYMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

0.20%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.01%

0.49%

+1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61%

0.65%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.73%

0.88%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.81%

1.05%

+2.76%

FMHTX vs. DNYMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMHTX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than DNYMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMHTX vs. DNYMX - Dividend Comparison

FMHTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than DNYMX's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNYMX
DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.65%2.36%2.73%1.92%0.70%0.59%1.06%1.31%1.21%1.04%1.08%0.00%
FMHTX
Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund
2.89%3.74%2.74%2.41%1.66%2.22%2.39%2.80%2.95%3.09%3.86%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMHTX and DNYMX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMHTX has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to DNYMX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMHTX dropped -22.17% vs DNYMX's -3.19%.

DNYMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMHTX and DNYMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer