PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMHTX vs. SCHZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMHTX vs. SCHZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund (FMHTX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMHTX achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than SCHZ's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, FMHTX has outperformed SCHZ with an annualized return of 1.95%, while SCHZ has yielded a comparatively lower 1.49% annualized return.


FMHTX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.64%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.89%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
4.19%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*
1.95%

SCHZ

1D
0.09%
1M
0.70%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.56%
1Y
4.29%
3Y*
3.93%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
1.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMHTX vs. SCHZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMHTX
Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund
1.47%5.34%1.98%6.00%-9.88%1.19%4.91%7.16%0.90%5.58%
SCHZ
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.47%7.24%1.26%5.60%-13.17%-1.72%7.46%8.65%-0.26%3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FMHTX and SCHZ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2011

0.49

The correlation between FMHTX and SCHZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMHTX vs. SCHZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMHTX
FMHTX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FMHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FMHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHZ
SCHZ Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SCHZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMHTX vs. SCHZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund (FMHTX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMHTXSCHZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.20

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

1.60

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

4.59

+3.98

FMHTX vs. SCHZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMHTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the SCHZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMHTX and SCHZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMHTX vs. SCHZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMHTX drawdown since its inception was -22.17%, which is greater than SCHZ's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMHTX and SCHZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMHTXSCHZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.17%

-18.74%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-2.70%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.72%

-6.18%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.36%

-18.01%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.36%

-18.74%

+4.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-2.30%

+2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-3.68%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.94%

-0.16%

Volatility

FMHTX vs. SCHZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund (FMHTX) is 0.81%, while Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) has a volatility of 1.15%. This indicates that FMHTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMHTXSCHZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

1.15%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.01%

2.78%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59%

3.76%

-1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.73%

6.09%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.81%

5.42%

-1.61%

FMHTX vs. SCHZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMHTX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHZ's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMHTX vs. SCHZ - Dividend Comparison

FMHTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than SCHZ's 4.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMHTX
Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund
2.89%3.74%2.74%2.41%1.66%2.22%2.39%2.80%2.95%3.09%3.86%2.86%
SCHZ
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.11%4.05%3.96%3.28%2.63%2.16%2.43%2.79%2.56%2.40%2.24%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMHTX and SCHZ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHZ has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to FMHTX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMHTX dropped -22.17% vs SCHZ's -18.74%.

FMHTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMHTX and SCHZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer