FMHTX vs. SCHZ
FMHTX (Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund) and SCHZ (Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both funds - FMHTX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while SCHZ is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, FMHTX returned 1.95%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for SCHZ. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FMHTX charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHZ.
Performance
FMHTX vs. SCHZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMHTX achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than SCHZ's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, FMHTX has outperformed SCHZ with an annualized return of 1.95%, while SCHZ has yielded a comparatively lower 1.49% annualized return.
FMHTX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 6.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.19%
- 5Y*
- 0.91%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
SCHZ
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 3.93%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.49%
FMHTX vs. SCHZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMHTX Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund | 1.47% | 5.34% | 1.98% | 6.00% | -9.88% | 1.19% | 4.91% | 7.16% | 0.90% | 5.58% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.47% | 7.24% | 1.26% | 5.60% | -13.17% | -1.72% | 7.46% | 8.65% | -0.26% | 3.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMHTX and SCHZ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2011 | 0.49 |
The correlation between FMHTX and SCHZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMHTX vs. SCHZ — Risk / Return Rank
FMHTX
SCHZ
FMHTX vs. SCHZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund (FMHTX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FMHTX | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.20 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 1.60 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.58 | 4.59 | +3.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FMHTX vs. SCHZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMHTX drawdown since its inception was -22.17%, which is greater than SCHZ's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMHTX and SCHZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMHTX | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.17% | -18.74% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | -2.70% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.72% | -6.18% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.36% | -18.01% | +3.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.36% | -18.74% | +4.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -2.30% | +2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -3.68% | +1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 0.94% | -0.16% |
Volatility
FMHTX vs. SCHZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund (FMHTX) is 0.81%, while Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) has a volatility of 1.15%. This indicates that FMHTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMHTX | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | 1.15% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.01% | 2.78% | -0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59% | 3.76% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 6.09% | -2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.81% | 5.42% | -1.61% |
FMHTX vs. SCHZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMHTX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHZ's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMHTX vs. SCHZ - Dividend Comparison
FMHTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than SCHZ's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMHTX Fidelity Michigan Municipal Income Fund | 2.89% | 3.74% | 2.74% | 2.41% | 1.66% | 2.22% | 2.39% | 2.80% | 2.95% | 3.09% | 3.86% | 2.86% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.11% | 4.05% | 3.96% | 3.28% | 2.63% | 2.16% | 2.43% | 2.79% | 2.56% | 2.40% | 2.24% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMHTX and SCHZ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHZ has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to FMHTX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMHTX dropped -22.17% vs SCHZ's -18.74%.
FMHTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMHTX and SCHZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer