PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMHI vs. RDVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMHI vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMHI achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 17.25% return.


FMHI

1D
-0.17%
1M
-1.74%
6M
1.23%
YTD
1.81%
1Y
7.04%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.09%

RDVY

1D
0.36%
1M
1.19%
6M
12.71%
YTD
17.25%
1Y
30.74%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
16.25%
ALL TIME*
13.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.95M$5.04M$4.81M
$77.65M$79.19M$83.63M

FMHI vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMHI
First Trust Municipal High Income ETF
1.81%3.54%5.41%7.20%-14.67%7.58%4.09%10.34%2.50%1.36%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
17.25%18.90%16.41%20.38%-13.27%31.14%13.47%37.71%-9.92%5.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FMHI and RDVY is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2017

0.05

Over the past year, FMHI and RDVY have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMHI vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMHI
FMHI Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FMHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FMHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMHI Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMHI vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMHIRDVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.35

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

3.25

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.03

13.63

-0.60

FMHI vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMHI Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMHI and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMHI vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMHI drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, smaller than the maximum RDVY drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMHI and RDVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMHIRDVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.83%

-40.60%

+21.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.35%

-9.04%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.70%

-19.11%

+13.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.83%

-25.32%

+6.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

0.00%

-1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-4.95%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

2.15%

-1.55%

Volatility

FMHI vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) is 1.03%, while First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that FMHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMHIRDVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

3.53%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.36%

11.46%

-9.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14%

14.65%

-11.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.79%

18.92%

-14.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.69%

21.03%

-15.34%

FMHI vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMHI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMHI vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

FMHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than RDVY's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMHI
First Trust Municipal High Income ETF
4.36%4.16%4.01%3.89%3.57%2.87%3.13%3.33%3.46%0.30%0.00%0.00%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.83%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMHI and RDVY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDVY has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to FMHI (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMHI dropped -18.83% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

On 5-year performance, RDVY leads with 12.89% vs 0.34% for FMHI. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, FMHI has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 12.89% return vs 0.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FMHI.

FMHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 0.83% for RDVY.

FMHI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while RDVY is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FMHI and 0.47% for RDVY.

FMHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMHI and RDVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer