PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMHI vs. ANGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMHI vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMHI achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly higher than ANGL's 1.76% return.


FMHI

1D
0.17%
1M
0.92%
YTD
2.60%
6M
3.13%
1Y
8.61%
3Y*
5.50%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*

ANGL

1D
0.10%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.76%
6M
1.98%
1Y
8.57%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
6.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMHI vs. ANGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMHI
First Trust Municipal High Income ETF
2.60%3.54%5.41%7.20%-14.67%7.58%4.09%10.34%2.50%1.08%
ANGL
VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
1.76%9.04%6.06%12.52%-14.26%6.84%13.20%18.06%-5.84%0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FMHI and ANGL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.25

Over the past year, FMHI and ANGL have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMHI vs. ANGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMHI
FMHI Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FMHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FMHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMHI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ANGL
ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMHI vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMHIANGLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.77

2.00

+0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.30

2.87

+1.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.40

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

2.11

+1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.45

8.88

+4.57

FMHI vs. ANGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMHI Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the ANGL Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMHI and ANGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMHIANGLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

2.00

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.46

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.74

-0.18

Drawdowns

FMHI vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMHI drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, smaller than the maximum ANGL drawdown of -29.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMHI and ANGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMHIANGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.83%

-29.31%

+10.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.35%

-4.05%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.17%

-5.48%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.83%

-19.25%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.10%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-3.30%

-1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

0.96%

-0.34%

Volatility

FMHI vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Municipal High Income ETF (FMHI) is 0.96%, while VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that FMHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMHIANGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

1.40%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.11%

3.46%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13%

4.30%

-1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.77%

7.63%

-2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.73%

9.28%

-3.55%

FMHI vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMHI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ANGL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMHI vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison

FMHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than ANGL's 6.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANGL
VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
6.36%6.20%6.29%5.27%4.72%3.90%4.67%5.19%5.99%5.25%5.34%5.81%
FMHI
First Trust Municipal High Income ETF
4.25%4.16%4.01%3.89%3.57%2.87%3.13%3.33%3.46%0.30%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMHI and ANGL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANGL has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to FMHI (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMHI dropped -18.83% vs ANGL's -29.31%.

On 5-year performance, ANGL leads with 3.53% vs 0.91% for FMHI. On fees, ANGL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FMHI has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ANGL has performed better with a 3.53% return vs 0.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ANGL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FMHI.

ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 6.36%, compared with 4.25% for FMHI.

FMHI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while ANGL is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FMHI and 0.35% for ANGL.

FMHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMHI and ANGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer