PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMGKX vs. VOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMGKX vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Magellan Fund Class K (FMGKX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMGKX achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly lower than VOT's 7.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FMGKX has outperformed VOT with an annualized return of 16.03%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.50% annualized return.


FMGKX

1D
-0.88%
1M
1.36%
YTD
7.08%
6M
5.88%
1Y
11.09%
3Y*
23.30%
5Y*
12.68%
10Y*
16.03%

VOT

1D
-1.99%
1M
3.19%
YTD
7.86%
6M
5.95%
1Y
10.01%
3Y*
15.69%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
12.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMGKX vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMGKX
Fidelity Magellan Fund Class K
7.08%16.35%32.08%31.15%-27.11%27.08%28.49%31.42%-5.67%26.60%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
7.86%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-5.56%21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FMGKX and VOT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2008

0.92

The correlation between FMGKX and VOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMGKX vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMGKX
FMGKX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FMGKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMGKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMGKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FMGKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMGKX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMGKX vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Magellan Fund Class K (FMGKX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMGKXVOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.11

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

0.63

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.20

1.87

+1.32

FMGKX vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMGKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMGKX and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMGKX vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMGKX drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, roughly equal to the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMGKX and VOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMGKXVOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.38%

-60.16%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.95%

-15.96%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.05%

-21.77%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.05%

-37.19%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.05%

-37.19%

+4.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-1.99%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.92%

-9.94%

-0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

5.35%

-1.42%

Volatility

FMGKX vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Magellan Fund Class K (FMGKX) is 6.48%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that FMGKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMGKXVOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.48%

7.06%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.70%

13.69%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.45%

16.92%

-1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.29%

21.53%

-1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.27%

21.04%

-0.77%

FMGKX vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMGKX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMGKX vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

FMGKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, more than VOT's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMGKX
Fidelity Magellan Fund Class K
6.43%13.90%9.26%11.80%5.08%7.07%0.30%15.04%10.95%9.74%2.87%7.69%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.62%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMGKX and VOT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOT has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to FMGKX (6.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMGKX dropped -59.38% vs VOT's -60.16%.

FMGKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMGKX and VOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer