FMGIX vs. CSUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX).
FMGIX is managed by Frontier Funds. It was launched on Jan 17, 2012. CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004.
Performance
FMGIX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FMGIX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMGIX Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund | 6.75% | 22.67% | 34.26% | 4.86% | -9.46% | 13.84% | -1.36% | 28.00% | -6.62% | 20.25% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMGIX achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than CSUIX's 8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FMGIX has outperformed CSUIX with an annualized return of 10.03%, while CSUIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.83% annualized return.
FMGIX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -5.22%
- YTD
- 6.75%
- 6M
- 8.05%
- 1Y
- 20.40%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 13.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FMGIX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMGIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FMGIX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
FMGIX
CSUIX
FMGIX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMGIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 1.67 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | 2.21 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.42 | +0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.65 | 10.58 | +0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMGIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 1.67 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.64 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.53 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.58 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between FMGIX and CSUIX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FMGIX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
FMGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.50%, more than CSUIX's 7.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMGIX Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund | 31.50% | 33.65% | 48.77% | 4.79% | 3.98% | 2.63% | 2.38% | 2.63% | 3.09% | 3.15% | 2.83% | 2.79% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
FMGIX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMGIX drawdown since its inception was -57.57%, which is greater than CSUIX's maximum drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMGIX and CSUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMGIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.57% | -52.01% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.74% | -7.99% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.61% | -20.01% | -6.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.57% | -35.01% | -22.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.22% | -4.36% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | -8.21% | +2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 1.82% | +0.22% |
Volatility
FMGIX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.24%. This indicates that FMGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FMGIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 3.24% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.97% | 6.90% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.91% | 11.49% | +0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.44% | 12.86% | +15.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.56% | 14.88% | +37.68% |