PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMFMX vs. FOKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMFMX vs. FOKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Growth Fund (FMFMX) and Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMFMX achieves a 15.75% return, which is significantly lower than FOKFX's 28.00% return.


FMFMX

1D
0.43%
1M
7.42%
YTD
15.75%
6M
14.89%
1Y
31.28%
3Y*
26.10%
5Y*
14.87%
10Y*
19.56%

FOKFX

1D
0.90%
1M
11.67%
YTD
28.00%
6M
26.89%
1Y
59.16%
3Y*
32.88%
5Y*
18.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMFMX vs. FOKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FMFMX
Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Growth Fund
15.75%14.98%30.90%37.23%-23.65%18.56%45.18%12.91%
FOKFX
Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio
28.00%20.30%34.58%43.48%-32.32%25.95%47.52%17.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FMFMX and FOKFX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019

0.97

The correlation between FMFMX and FOKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMFMX vs. FOKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMFMX
FMFMX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FMFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FMFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FOKFX
FOKFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FOKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FOKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMFMX vs. FOKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Growth Fund (FMFMX) and Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMFMXFOKFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.54

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

4.82

-2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.61

19.97

-10.36

FMFMX vs. FOKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMFMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the FOKFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMFMX and FOKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMFMXFOKFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

3.27

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.81

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.96

-0.19

Drawdowns

FMFMX vs. FOKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMFMX drawdown since its inception was -36.89%, roughly equal to the maximum FOKFX drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMFMX and FOKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMFMXFOKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.89%

-37.26%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.60%

-12.53%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.89%

-24.81%

-12.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.89%

-37.26%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.32%

-9.20%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

3.01%

+0.34%

Volatility

FMFMX vs. FOKFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Growth Fund (FMFMX) is 4.18%, while Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that FMFMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMFMXFOKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

5.62%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.68%

14.55%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.28%

18.45%

-2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.86%

23.01%

+1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.97%

24.63%

-1.66%

FMFMX vs. FOKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMFMX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FOKFX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMFMX vs. FOKFX - Dividend Comparison

FMFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.56%, more than FOKFX's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMFMX
Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Growth Fund
12.56%14.54%28.50%5.57%5.69%16.12%27.01%13.51%9.43%18.29%0.12%0.15%
FOKFX
Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio
3.28%4.20%4.58%0.24%0.08%3.81%0.39%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FMFMX and FOKFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOKFX has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to FMFMX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMFMX dropped -36.89% vs FOKFX's -37.26%.

FOKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMFMX and FOKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer