FMFMX vs. VOO

In the year-to-date period, FMFMX achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, FMFMX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 4.31%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FMFMX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Growth Fund (FMFMX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FMFMX Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMFMX and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FMFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than VOO's 1.29% yield.

The maximum FMFMX drawdown since its inception was -41.61%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMFMX and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Growth Fund (FMFMX) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 6.22%. This indicates that FMFMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.