FMFMX vs. FIPDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Growth Fund (FMFMX) and Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX).
FMFMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 6, 2014. FIPDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 16, 2012.
Performance
FMFMX vs. FIPDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FMFMX vs. FIPDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMFMX Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Growth Fund | -5.25% | 14.98% | 30.90% | 37.23% | -23.65% | 18.56% | 45.18% | 35.17% | -0.07% | 36.89% |
FIPDX Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 0.33% | 6.90% | 2.00% | 3.77% | -12.09% | 5.94% | 10.90% | 8.32% | -1.37% | 2.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMFMX achieves a -5.25% return, which is significantly lower than FIPDX's 0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FMFMX has outperformed FIPDX with an annualized return of 17.40%, while FIPDX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.58% annualized return.
FMFMX
- 1D
- 4.26%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- -5.25%
- 6M
- -4.92%
- 1Y
- 17.91%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- 17.40%
FIPDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 2.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 2.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FMFMX vs. FIPDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMFMX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FIPDX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FMFMX vs. FIPDX — Risk / Return Rank
FMFMX
FIPDX
FMFMX vs. FIPDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Growth Fund (FMFMX) and Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMFMX | FIPDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.73 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 1.02 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.13 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 1.18 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | 3.68 | +1.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMFMX | FIPDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.73 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.23 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.48 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.40 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between FMFMX and FIPDX is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
FMFMX vs. FIPDX - Dividend Comparison
FMFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.35%, more than FIPDX's 4.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMFMX Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Growth Fund | 15.35% | 14.54% | 28.50% | 5.57% | 5.69% | 16.12% | 27.01% | 13.51% | 9.43% | 18.29% | 0.12% | 0.15% |
FIPDX Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 4.16% | 4.18% | 3.75% | 3.56% | 8.87% | 4.76% | 1.24% | 1.97% | 2.26% | 1.29% | 1.34% | 0.38% |
Drawdowns
FMFMX vs. FIPDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMFMX drawdown since its inception was -36.89%, which is greater than FIPDX's maximum drawdown of -14.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMFMX and FIPDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMFMX | FIPDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.89% | -14.32% | -22.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.96% | -2.90% | -10.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.89% | -14.32% | -22.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.89% | -14.32% | -22.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.20% | -1.40% | -13.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -4.52% | -2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 0.93% | +2.76% |
Volatility
FMFMX vs. FIPDX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Series Equity Growth Fund (FMFMX) has a higher volatility of 7.71% compared to Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) at 1.35%. This indicates that FMFMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIPDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FMFMX | FIPDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 1.35% | +6.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.30% | 2.34% | +10.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.99% | 4.12% | +17.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.83% | 5.99% | +18.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 5.38% | +17.53% |