FMF vs. RLY
FMF (First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund) and RLY (SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) are both Hedge Fund funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FMF returned 3.17%/yr vs 8.56%/yr for RLY. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FMF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RLY.
Performance
FMF vs. RLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMF achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly lower than RLY's 17.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FMF has underperformed RLY with an annualized return of 3.17%, while RLY has yielded a comparatively higher 8.56% annualized return.
FMF
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 6.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.17%
RLY
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 17.13%
- 6M
- 18.27%
- 1Y
- 31.78%
- 3Y*
- 15.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
FMF vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMF First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 10.96% | 4.54% | 8.17% | -0.18% | 5.24% | 3.57% | 5.69% | -5.16% | -2.64% | 1.70% |
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 17.13% | 20.26% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 7.86% | 22.85% | -0.59% | 15.63% | -11.72% | 10.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMF and RLY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2013 | 0.21 |
Over the past year, FMF and RLY have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMF vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank
FMF
RLY
FMF vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund (FMF) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMF | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.60 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.52 | 8.60 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.49 | 31.17 | -12.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMF | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 3.17 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.77 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.62 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.38 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
FMF vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMF drawdown since its inception was -22.21%, smaller than the maximum RLY drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMF and RLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMF | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.21% | -37.75% | +15.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.42% | -3.71% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.25% | -10.08% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.98% | -18.94% | +3.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.89% | -34.17% | +17.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -1.60% | +1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.86% | -9.46% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 1.02% | +0.18% |
Volatility
FMF vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund (FMF) is 1.89%, while SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) has a volatility of 3.00%. This indicates that FMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMF | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.89% | 3.00% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.11% | 8.15% | -1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.66% | 10.06% | -0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.74% | 13.54% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.72% | 13.81% | -2.09% |
FMF vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMF vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison
FMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than RLY's 2.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMF First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 4.96% | 5.60% | 4.85% | 3.09% | 0.41% | 3.29% | 0.02% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 2.86% | 3.24% | 3.31% | 3.71% | 5.66% | 12.15% | 2.16% | 3.45% | 2.76% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMF and RLY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RLY has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to FMF (1.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMF dropped -22.21% vs RLY's -37.75%.
On 10-year performance, RLY leads with 8.56% vs 3.17% for FMF. On fees, RLY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FMF has been the lower-risk option at 1.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RLY has performed better with a 8.56% return vs 3.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RLY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FMF.
FMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 2.86% for RLY.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FMF and 0.50% for RLY.
RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMF and RLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer