PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMED vs. FFRHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMED vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMED achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than FFRHX's 1.71% return.


FMED

1D
1.03%
1M
6.62%
YTD
-2.44%
6M
-4.06%
1Y
12.97%
3Y*
1.97%
5Y*
10Y*

FFRHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
1.71%
6M
2.32%
1Y
5.89%
3Y*
7.20%
5Y*
5.40%
10Y*
4.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMED vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FMED
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
-2.44%9.69%2.29%-3.59%
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
1.71%5.47%7.10%7.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FMED and FFRHX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2023

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMED vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMED
FMED Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FMED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMED Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMED Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FMED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMED Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FFRHX
FFRHX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FFRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMED vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMEDFFRHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.87

-0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

4.97

-4.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.55

17.06

-15.51

FMED vs. FFRHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMED Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMED and FFRHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMED vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMED drawdown since its inception was -21.84%, roughly equal to the maximum FFRHX drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMED and FFRHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMEDFFRHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.84%

-22.20%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.33%

-1.19%

-17.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.84%

-3.29%

-18.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.48%

-0.44%

-8.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-1.15%

-5.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.38%

0.35%

+8.03%

Volatility

FMED vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.66%. This indicates that FMED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMEDFFRHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

0.66%

+5.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.04%

1.63%

+13.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.27%

2.37%

+16.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.53%

2.88%

+15.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.53%

4.14%

+14.39%

FMED vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMED has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMED vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

FMED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFRHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.09%7.41%6.94%8.24%3.81%2.74%3.84%5.15%4.74%4.05%4.44%3.69%
FMED
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
0.00%0.00%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMED and FFRHX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMED has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to FFRHX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMED dropped -21.84% vs FFRHX's -22.20%.

FFRHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMED and FFRHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer