FMED vs. FBTC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FMED (Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF) and FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FMED is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. FMED is actively managed, while FBTC is passively managed. Over the past year, FMED returned 12.97% vs -39.80% for FBTC. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FMED charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FBTC.

Performance

FMED vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMED achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -28.83% return.

FMED

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 6.62%
• YTD: -2.44%
• 6M: -4.06%
• 1Y: 12.97%
• 3Y*: 1.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBTC

• 1D: -3.16%
• 1M: -17.78%
• YTD: -28.83%
• 6M: -28.94%
• 1Y: -39.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMED vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FMED Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF	-2.44%	9.69%	1.28%
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	-28.83%	-6.56%	94.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FMED and FBTC is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.27

Return for Risk

FMED vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMED

FMED Risk / Return Rank: 19
FMED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
FMED Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FMED Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FMED Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FMED Martin Ratio Rank: 16

FBTC

FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMED vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMED	FBTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	-0.90	+1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	-1.26	+2.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	0.86	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.71	-0.77	+1.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.55	-1.30	+2.86

FMED vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMED Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMED and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FMED vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMED drawdown since its inception was -21.84%, smaller than the maximum FBTC drawdown of -52.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMED and FBTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMED	FBTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.84%	-52.07%	+30.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.33%	-52.07%	+33.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.48%	-50.43%	+41.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.11%	-16.77%	+9.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.38%	30.54%	-22.16%

Volatility

FMED vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED) is 6.57%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a volatility of 13.04%. This indicates that FMED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMED	FBTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.57%	13.04%	-6.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.04%	34.56%	-19.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.27%	44.18%	-24.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.53%	50.08%	-31.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.53%	50.08%	-31.55%

FMED vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMED has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMED vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

Neither FMED nor FBTC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FMED Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMED and FBTC in my portfolio?

FMED and FBTC have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMED or FBTC?

FBTC has higher volatility (13.04%) compared to FMED (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMED dropped -21.84% vs FBTC's -52.07%.

Which ETF is better, FMED or FBTC?

On 1-year performance, FMED leads with 12.97% vs -39.80% for FBTC. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FMED has been the lower-risk option at 6.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FMED or FBTC?

Over the 1-year period, FMED has performed better with a 12.97% return vs -39.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMED or FBTC?

FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FMED.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMED or FBTC?

FMED and FBTC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FMED and FBTC?

FMED is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FMED and 0.25% for FBTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.