PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMED vs. CHPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMED vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMED achieves a -4.75% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 88.78% return.


FMED

1D
0.90%
1M
7.10%
YTD
-4.75%
6M
-6.17%
1Y
8.53%
3Y*
0.73%
5Y*
10Y*

CHPY

1D
5.00%
1M
22.07%
YTD
88.78%
6M
92.44%
1Y
148.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMED vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FMED and CHPY is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMED vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMED
FMED Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FMED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMED Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FMED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMED Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMED vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMEDCHPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.73

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

12.31

-11.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.03

43.93

-42.89

FMED vs. CHPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMED Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the CHPY Sharpe Ratio of 4.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMED and CHPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMED vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMED drawdown since its inception was -21.84%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -12.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMED and CHPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMEDCHPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.84%

-12.19%

-9.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.33%

-12.17%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.64%

0.00%

-10.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-2.12%

-4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.27%

3.40%

+4.87%

Volatility

FMED vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF (FMED) is 7.50%, while YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a volatility of 17.55%. This indicates that FMED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMEDCHPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.50%

17.55%

-10.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.01%

26.62%

-11.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.37%

31.06%

-11.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.57%

35.45%

-16.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.57%

35.45%

-16.88%

FMED vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMED has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMED vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

FMED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.02%.


PositionTTM20252024
CHPY
YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF
28.02%28.19%0.00%
FMED
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
0.00%0.00%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMED and CHPY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPY has higher volatility (17.55%) compared to FMED (7.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMED dropped -21.84% vs CHPY's -12.19%.

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 148.83% vs 8.53% for FMED. On fees, FMED is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FMED has been the lower-risk option at 7.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 148.83% return vs 8.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMED is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CHPY.

CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 28.02%, compared with 0.00% for FMED.

FMED is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while CHPY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FMED and 0.99% for CHPY.

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.83 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMED and CHPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer