FMDE vs. QRSVX
FMDE (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF) and QRSVX (FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class) are both funds - FMDE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while QRSVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value. FMDE is actively managed, while QRSVX is passively managed. Over the past year, FMDE returned 21.18% vs 37.90% for QRSVX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FMDE charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for QRSVX.
Performance
FMDE vs. QRSVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMDE achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly lower than QRSVX's 24.66% return.
FMDE
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QRSVX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 6.19%
- YTD
- 24.66%
- 6M
- 23.12%
- 1Y
- 37.90%
- 3Y*
- 21.48%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- —
FMDE vs. QRSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 10.64% | 12.19% | 21.76% | 8.91% |
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class | 24.66% | 13.37% | 10.72% | 9.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMDE and QRSVX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.86 |
The correlation between FMDE and QRSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMDE vs. QRSVX — Risk / Return Rank
FMDE
QRSVX
FMDE vs. QRSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) and FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMDE | QRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.44 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 4.75 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.11 | 16.81 | -6.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMDE | QRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.49 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.36 | 0.83 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
FMDE vs. QRSVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMDE drawdown since its inception was -21.10%, roughly equal to the maximum QRSVX drawdown of -20.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMDE and QRSVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMDE | QRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.10% | -20.59% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -7.93% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.28% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.64% | -4.89% | +2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.23% | -0.13% |
Volatility
FMDE vs. QRSVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) is 3.16%, while FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that FMDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QRSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMDE | QRSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 4.50% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 10.45% | -0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.59% | 15.17% | -1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 17.48% | -1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 17.49% | -1.37% |
FMDE vs. QRSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMDE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than QRSVX's 0.94% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMDE vs. QRSVX - Dividend Comparison
FMDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than QRSVX's 3.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 1.10% | 1.23% | 1.11% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class | 3.57% | 4.45% | 4.86% | 2.56% | 2.07% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMDE and QRSVX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QRSVX has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to FMDE (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMDE dropped -21.10% vs QRSVX's -20.59%.
QRSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMDE and QRSVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer