PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMCC vs. TLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMCC vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Freddie Mac (FMCC) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMCC achieves a -40.24% return, which is significantly lower than TLTW's 1.44% return.


FMCC

1D
6.50%
1M
-14.65%
YTD
-40.24%
6M
-44.15%
1Y
-11.53%
3Y*
139.70%
5Y*
21.17%
10Y*
11.02%

TLTW

1D
0.23%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.44%
6M
0.46%
1Y
9.58%
3Y*
0.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMCC vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FMCC
Freddie Mac
-40.24%210.52%284.18%140.59%-36.91%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
1.44%11.36%-2.18%0.73%-11.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FMCC and TLTW is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2022

-0.05

The correlation between FMCC and TLTW shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (3 years) to 0.06 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMCC vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMCC
FMCC Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FMCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCC Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCC Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMCC vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freddie Mac (FMCC) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMCCTLTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.22

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

1.61

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.31

4.81

-5.12

FMCC vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMCC and TLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMCCTLTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

1.26

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

-0.02

-0.03

Drawdowns

FMCC vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMCC drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, which is greater than TLTW's maximum drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCC and TLTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMCCTLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.81%

-18.61%

-81.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.31%

-5.97%

-65.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.31%

-17.19%

-54.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.92%

-2.98%

-90.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.87%

-8.25%

-60.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.39%

2.00%

+35.39%

Volatility

FMCC vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

Freddie Mac (FMCC) has a higher volatility of 17.51% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) at 2.44%. This indicates that FMCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMCCTLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.51%

2.44%

+15.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.46%

5.79%

+60.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

93.23%

7.70%

+85.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.67%

11.39%

+75.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.77%

11.39%

+67.38%

Dividends

FMCC vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

FMCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.73%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
FMCC
Freddie Mac
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
11.73%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMCC and TLTW have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMCC has higher volatility (17.51%) compared to TLTW (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMCC dropped -99.81% vs TLTW's -18.61%.

TLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMCC and TLTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer