PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMCC vs. ASR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FMCC vs. ASR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Freddie Mac (FMCC) and Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. (ASR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMCC achieves a -42.66% return, which is significantly lower than ASR's -9.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FMCC has outperformed ASR with an annualized return of 11.72%, while ASR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.32% annualized return.


FMCC

1D
2.76%
1M
-17.41%
YTD
-42.66%
6M
-43.55%
1Y
-26.78%
3Y*
136.25%
5Y*
19.46%
10Y*
11.72%

ASR

1D
1.07%
1M
-4.15%
YTD
-9.55%
6M
-8.65%
1Y
-3.36%
3Y*
6.19%
5Y*
14.67%
10Y*
10.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMCC vs. ASR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMCC
Freddie Mac
-42.66%210.52%284.18%140.59%-57.43%-64.38%-22.33%183.02%-57.94%-32.62%
ASR
Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V.
-9.55%42.19%-9.20%32.09%16.98%27.81%-11.99%28.79%-15.64%26.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FMCC and ASR is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2000

0.15

Fundamentals

EPS

FMCC:

$4.74

ASR:

MX$327.81

PE Ratio

FMCC:

1.23

ASR:

15.10

PEG Ratio

FMCC:

0.00

ASR:

0.76

PS Ratio

FMCC:

0.14

ASR:

3.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

FMCC:

$100.04B

ASR:

MX$37.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FMCC:

$100.04B

ASR:

MX$21.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

FMCC:

$92.03B

ASR:

MX$18.53B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMCC vs. ASR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMCC
FMCC Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FMCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCC Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCC Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

ASR
ASR Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
ASR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASR Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ASR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASR Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMCC vs. ASR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freddie Mac (FMCC) and Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. (ASR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMCCASRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.00

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

-0.13

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.70

-0.33

-0.37

FMCC vs. ASR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the ASR Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMCC and ASR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMCC vs. ASR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMCC drawdown since its inception was -99.81%, which is greater than ASR's maximum drawdown of -61.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCC and ASR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMCCASRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.81%

-61.33%

-38.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.31%

-26.13%

-45.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.31%

-33.81%

-37.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.97%

-35.28%

-49.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.97%

-61.33%

-30.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.17%

-23.25%

-70.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.88%

-14.45%

-54.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.50%

10.30%

+28.20%

Volatility

FMCC vs. ASR - Volatility Comparison

Freddie Mac (FMCC) has a higher volatility of 16.83% compared to Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. (ASR) at 8.54%. This indicates that FMCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMCCASRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.83%

8.54%

+8.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.64%

21.56%

+44.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.69%

26.10%

+66.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.65%

32.53%

+54.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.76%

34.82%

+43.94%

Dividends

FMCC vs. ASR - Dividend Comparison

FMCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASR
Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V.
7.64%12.61%4.68%3.86%3.18%2.00%0.00%2.80%2.29%0.05%0.05%0.52%
FMCC
Freddie Mac
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FMCC vs. ASR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Freddie Mac and Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B202220232024202520260
9.02B
(FMCC) Total Revenue
(ASR) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FMCC values in USD, ASR values in MXN

Frequently Asked Questions


FMCC and ASR have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMCC has higher volatility (16.83%) compared to ASR (8.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMCC dropped -99.81% vs ASR's -61.33%.

ASR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.13 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMCC and ASR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer