ASR vs. LAZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. (ASR) and Lazard Ltd (LAZ).

Performance

ASR vs. LAZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. (ASR) and Lazard Ltd (LAZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ASR vs. LAZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ASR Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V.	3.94%	42.19%	-9.20%	32.09%	16.98%	27.81%	-11.99%	28.79%	-15.64%	26.89%
LAZ Lazard Ltd	-11.74%	-1.64%	54.83%	6.92%	-16.21%	7.41%	12.08%	15.22%	-25.38%	36.20%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ASR : $10.08B LAZ : $4.57B
EPS ASR : $349.52 LAZ : $2.23
PE Ratio ASR : 0.96 LAZ : 19.04
PS Ratio ASR : 0.27 LAZ : 1.42
PB Ratio ASR : 0.26 LAZ : 5.23
Total Revenue (TTM) ASR : $37.24B LAZ : $3.17B
Gross Profit (TTM) ASR : $24.93B LAZ : $1.03B
EBITDA (TTM) ASR : $18.68B LAZ : $418.11M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASR achieves a 3.94% return, which is significantly higher than LAZ's -11.74% return. Over the past 10 years, ASR has outperformed LAZ with an annualized return of 12.13%, while LAZ has yielded a comparatively lower 6.15% annualized return.

ASR

• 1D: 3.50%
• 1M: -6.54%
• YTD: 3.94%
• 6M: 6.81%
• 1Y: 39.05%
• 3Y*: 10.46%
• 5Y*: 19.29%
• 10Y*: 12.13%

LAZ

• 1D: 5.33%
• 1M: -16.05%
• YTD: -11.74%
• 6M: -17.96%
• 1Y: 2.24%
• 3Y*: 14.09%
• 5Y*: 3.85%
• 10Y*: 6.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ASR vs. LAZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASR

ASR Risk / Return Rank: 80
ASR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ASR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ASR Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ASR Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
ASR Martin Ratio Rank: 80

LAZ

LAZ Risk / Return Rank: 42
LAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
LAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
LAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 39
LAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
LAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASR vs. LAZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. (ASR) and Lazard Ltd (LAZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ASR	LAZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	0.05	+1.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	0.38	+1.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.05	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	0.08	+2.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.97	0.20	+5.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASR vs. LAZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASR Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the LAZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASR and LAZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASR	LAZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	0.05	+1.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.11	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.17	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.17	+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between ASR and LAZ is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ASR vs. LAZ - Dividend Comparison

ASR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.13%, more than LAZ's 4.71% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASR Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V.	12.13%	12.61%	4.68%	3.86%	3.18%	2.00%	0.00%	2.80%	2.29%	0.05%	0.05%	0.52%
LAZ Lazard Ltd	4.71%	4.12%	3.89%	5.75%	5.60%	4.31%	4.44%	5.88%	8.21%	5.35%	6.55%	5.22%

Drawdowns

ASR vs. LAZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASR drawdown since its inception was -61.33%, roughly equal to the maximum LAZ drawdown of -62.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASR and LAZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASR	LAZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.33%	-62.72%	+1.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.76%	-31.39%	+14.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.28%	-44.24%	+8.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.33%	-59.51%	-1.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.81%	-26.12%	+14.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.42%	-23.52%	+9.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.44%	12.47%	-6.03%

Volatility

ASR vs. LAZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. (ASR) is 11.47%, while Lazard Ltd (LAZ) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that ASR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASR	LAZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.47%	14.87%	-3.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.42%	26.91%	-8.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.96%	44.41%	-17.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.51%	36.35%	-3.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.71%	35.87%	-1.16%

Financials

ASR vs. LAZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. and Lazard Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ASR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. reported a gross profit of 4.95B and revenue of 10.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.1%.

LAZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lazard Ltd reported a gross profit of 252.59M and revenue of 938.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.

ASR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. reported an operating income of 3.79B and revenue of 10.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.5%.

LAZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lazard Ltd reported an operating income of 84.95M and revenue of 938.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

ASR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. reported a net income of 2.71B and revenue of 10.97B, resulting in a net margin of 24.7%.

LAZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lazard Ltd reported a net income of 49.86M and revenue of 938.59M, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.