PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMAY vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMAY vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMAY achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.78% return.


FMAY

1D
0.25%
1M
1.80%
YTD
5.65%
6M
6.55%
1Y
15.55%
3Y*
14.23%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*

ITOT

1D
0.48%
1M
4.64%
YTD
11.78%
6M
11.52%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMAY vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May
5.65%12.69%14.45%17.83%-8.08%11.00%10.91%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.78%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%32.45%

Correlation

The correlation between FMAY and ITOT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020

0.93

The correlation between FMAY and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FMAY vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FMAY
ITOT

Technology

36.2%
33.8%

Financial Services

11.9%
12.1%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
9.0%

Industrials

8.1%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.7%

Energy

3.5%
3.7%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.1%

Technology

FMAY
36.2%
ITOT
33.8%

Financial Services

FMAY
11.9%
ITOT
12.1%

Communication Services

FMAY
10.9%
ITOT
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FMAY
10.1%
ITOT
10.1%

Healthcare

FMAY
8.4%
ITOT
9.0%

Industrials

FMAY
8.1%
ITOT
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

FMAY
4.9%
ITOT
4.7%

Energy

FMAY
3.5%
ITOT
3.7%

Utilities

FMAY
2.3%
ITOT
2.3%

Real Estate

FMAY
1.9%
ITOT
2.4%

Basic Materials

FMAY
1.8%
ITOT
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMAY vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAY
FMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMAY vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMAYITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.43

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

3.25

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.75

14.92

+6.82

FMAY vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMAY and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMAYITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.37

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.74

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.57

+0.45

Drawdowns

FMAY vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAY and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMAYITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.60%

-55.20%

+41.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.22%

-8.90%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.12%

-19.44%

+6.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.60%

-25.36%

+11.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.25%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-6.97%

+4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

1.94%

-1.22%

Volatility

FMAY vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) is 1.03%, while iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that FMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMAYITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

2.94%

-1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.59%

9.14%

-4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.04%

12.19%

-6.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.59%

17.35%

-6.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.14%

18.26%

-8.12%

FMAY vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMAY vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

FMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.97%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FMAY and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ITOT has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to FMAY (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMAY dropped -13.60% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 5-year performance, ITOT leads with 12.80% vs 9.54% for FMAY. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FMAY has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 12.80% return vs 9.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FMAY.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for FMAY.

FMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FMAY and 0.03% for ITOT.

FMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMAY and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer