FMAY vs. DJUN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May) and DJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from First Trust - FMAY tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series while DJUN tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FMAY returned 9.54%/yr vs 8.20%/yr for DJUN. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

FMAY vs. DJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMAY achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly higher than DJUN's 3.79% return.

FMAY

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 1.80%
• YTD: 5.65%
• 6M: 6.55%
• 1Y: 15.55%
• 3Y*: 14.23%
• 5Y*: 9.54%
• 10Y*: —

DJUN

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 3.79%
• 6M: 4.47%
• 1Y: 10.96%
• 3Y*: 11.39%
• 5Y*: 8.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMAY vs. DJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	5.65%	12.69%	14.45%	17.83%	-8.08%	11.00%	8.67%
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June	3.79%	9.38%	13.92%	17.58%	-6.30%	6.27%	6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FMAY and DJUN is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020	0.91

The correlation between FMAY and DJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FMAY vs. DJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMAY

FMAY Risk / Return Rank: 84
FMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 91

DJUN

DJUN Risk / Return Rank: 78
DJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
DJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 85
DJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
DJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMAY vs. DJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FMAY	DJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	2.23	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.84	3.36	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.51	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.70	3.52	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.75	20.79	+0.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FMAY vs. DJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the DJUN Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMAY and DJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FMAY	DJUN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59	2.23	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.97	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	1.04	-0.02

Drawdowns

FMAY vs. DJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, which is greater than DJUN's maximum drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMAY and DJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMAY	DJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.60%	-11.96%	-1.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.22%	-3.15%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.12%	-11.96%	-1.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.60%	-11.96%	-1.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	0.00%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.01%	-1.59%	-0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	0.53%	+0.19%

Volatility

FMAY vs. DJUN - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) has a higher volatility of 1.03% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) at 0.20%. This indicates that FMAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMAY	DJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.03%	0.20%	+0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.59%	3.55%	+1.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.04%	4.98%	+1.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.59%	8.52%	+2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.14%	8.06%	+2.08%

FMAY vs. DJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FMAY and DJUN have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

FMAY vs. DJUN - Dividend Comparison

Neither FMAY nor DJUN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMAY and DJUN in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FMAY and DJUN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FMAY or DJUN?

FMAY has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to DJUN (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMAY dropped -13.60% vs DJUN's -11.96%.

Which ETF is better, FMAY or DJUN?

On 5-year performance, FMAY leads with 9.54% vs 8.20% for DJUN. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, DJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FMAY or DJUN?

Over the 5-year period, FMAY has performed better with a 9.54% return vs 8.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMAY or DJUN?

FMAY and DJUN have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMAY or DJUN?

FMAY and DJUN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FMAY and DJUN?

FMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series, while DJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.