FMAT vs. GBLD
FMAT (Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF) and GBLD (Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FMAT is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index, while GBLD is a Sustainable fund tracking the MSCI Global Green Building Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMAT charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for GBLD.
Performance
FMAT vs. GBLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FMAT
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 22.50%
- 3Y*
- 12.38%
- 5Y*
- 5.79%
- 10Y*
- 10.33%
GBLD
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMAT vs. GBLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF | 13.04% | 12.11% | 0.47% | 13.71% | -11.54% | 11.82% |
GBLD Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF | 4.52% | 17.95% | -5.63% | 6.39% | -21.69% | -2.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMAT and GBLD is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2021 | 0.64 |
The correlation between FMAT and GBLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMAT vs. GBLD — Risk / Return Rank
FMAT
GBLD
FMAT vs. GBLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) and Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF (GBLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMAT | GBLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.51 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMAT | GBLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FMAT vs. GBLD - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMAT | GBLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.97% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.87% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | — | — |
Volatility
FMAT vs. GBLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMAT | GBLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.60% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.19% | — | — |
FMAT vs. GBLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMAT has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GBLD's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMAT vs. GBLD - Dividend Comparison
FMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than GBLD's 3.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF | 1.42% | 1.64% | 1.68% | 1.71% | 2.00% | 1.44% | 1.73% | 1.89% | 2.18% | 1.53% | 1.78% | 2.16% |
GBLD Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF | 3.45% | 3.27% | 5.34% | 6.60% | 3.79% | 3.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMAT and GBLD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FMAT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FMAT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GBLD.
GBLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 1.42% for FMAT.
FMAT is categorized as Materials, while GBLD is Sustainable. FMAT tracks MSCI USA IMI Materials Index, while GBLD tracks MSCI Global Green Building Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FMAT and 0.39% for GBLD.
Find the right allocation for FMAT and GBLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer