FLYW vs. LU
FLYW (Flywire Corporation) and LU (Lufax Holding Ltd) are both stocks. FLYW operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while LU operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, FLYW returned -13.54%/yr vs -40.59%/yr for LU. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLYW vs. LU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLYW achieves a 3.88% return, which is significantly higher than LU's -48.05% return.
FLYW
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -7.08%
- YTD
- 3.88%
- 6M
- -0.41%
- 1Y
- 36.33%
- 3Y*
- -23.28%
- 5Y*
- -13.54%
- 10Y*
- —
LU
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -32.14%
- YTD
- -48.05%
- 6M
- -50.00%
- 1Y
- -54.45%
- 3Y*
- -22.60%
- 5Y*
- -40.59%
- 10Y*
- —
FLYW vs. LU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLYW Flywire Corporation | 3.88% | -31.33% | -10.93% | -5.39% | -35.71% | 11.94% |
LU Lufax Holding Ltd | -48.05% | 7.11% | 73.97% | -58.03% | -60.48% | -55.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLYW and LU is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
FLYW:
$188.60B
LU:
CN¥31.92B
FLYW:
$299.78M
LU:
CN¥13.50B
FLYW:
$11.02B
LU:
-CN¥1.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLYW vs. LU — Risk / Return Rank
FLYW
LU
FLYW vs. LU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flywire Corporation (FLYW) and Lufax Holding Ltd (LU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLYW | LU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.80 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | -0.78 | +2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.39 | -1.40 | +4.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLYW vs. LU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLYW drawdown since its inception was -84.40%, smaller than the maximum LU drawdown of -96.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYW and LU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLYW | LU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.40% | -96.68% | +12.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.16% | -69.77% | +41.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.98% | -69.77% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.40% | -94.84% | +10.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.74% | -95.42% | +22.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.06% | -78.39% | +22.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.75% | 38.81% | -28.06% |
Volatility
FLYW vs. LU - Volatility Comparison
Flywire Corporation (FLYW) has a higher volatility of 13.08% compared to Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) at 11.70%. This indicates that FLYW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLYW | LU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.08% | 11.70% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.78% | 34.40% | +2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.88% | 53.01% | -6.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.22% | 76.61% | -19.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.28% | 76.27% | -18.99% |
Dividends
FLYW vs. LU - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLYW nor LU has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLYW Flywire Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LU Lufax Holding Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 101.26% | 11.60% | 26.29% |
Financials
FLYW vs. LU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flywire Corporation and Lufax Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FLYW and LU have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLYW has higher volatility (13.08%) compared to LU (11.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLYW dropped -84.40% vs LU's -96.68%.
FLYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLYW and LU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer