FLYU vs. WEBL

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FLYU (MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs) and WEBL (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - FLYU tracks the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index while WEBL tracks the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLYU returned 4.85%/yr vs 27.57%/yr for WEBL. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLYU charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for WEBL.

Performance

FLYU vs. WEBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLYU achieves a -18.15% return, which is significantly lower than WEBL's -14.87% return.

FLYU

• 1D: 2.56%
• 1M: 19.09%
• YTD: -18.15%
• 6M: -16.93%
• 1Y: 1.53%
• 3Y*: 4.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WEBL

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -2.18%
• YTD: -14.87%
• 6M: -15.88%
• 1Y: -12.75%
• 3Y*: 27.57%
• 5Y*: -21.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLYU vs. WEBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs	-18.15%	-2.29%	33.00%	111.16%	-19.09%
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares	-14.87%	2.37%	76.78%	165.50%	-30.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FLYU and WEBL is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022	0.69

The correlation between FLYU and WEBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLYU vs. WEBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLYU	WEBL
Consumer Cyclical	52.6%	27.7%
Industrials	17.7%	1.4%
Technology	16.4%	37.7%
Communication Services	13.2%	29.7%
Real Estate	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	2.4%
Healthcare	-	1.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FLYU vs. WEBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLYU

FLYU Risk / Return Rank: 11
FLYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FLYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
FLYU Omega Ratio Rank: 14
FLYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FLYU Martin Ratio Rank: 10

WEBL

WEBL Risk / Return Rank: 8
WEBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
WEBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
WEBL Omega Ratio Rank: 9
WEBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
WEBL Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLYU vs. WEBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLYU	WEBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.02	-0.22	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	0.07	+0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.01	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.03	-0.23	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.06	-0.48	+0.54

FLYU vs. WEBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLYU Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is higher than the WEBL Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLYU and WEBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLYU vs. WEBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLYU drawdown since its inception was -69.00%, smaller than the maximum WEBL drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYU and WEBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLYU	WEBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.00%	-94.44%	+25.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.33%	-56.57%	+4.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.00%	-60.82%	-8.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-94.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.07%	-74.94%	+39.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.53%	-58.90%	+32.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.05%	26.44%	-1.39%

Volatility

FLYU vs. WEBL - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) has a higher volatility of 23.60% compared to Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) at 19.12%. This indicates that FLYU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLYU	WEBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.60%	19.12%	+4.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.07%	45.07%	+14.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.07%	57.70%	+17.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.21%	80.76%	+2.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.21%	82.82%	+0.39%

FLYU vs. WEBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than WEBL's 1.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLYU vs. WEBL - Dividend Comparison

FLYU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WEBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares	0.23%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.79%	0.00%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLYU and WEBL in my portfolio?

FLYU and WEBL have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLYU or WEBL?

FLYU has higher volatility (23.60%) compared to WEBL (19.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLYU dropped -69.00% vs WEBL's -94.44%.

Which ETF is better, FLYU or WEBL?

On 3-year performance, WEBL leads with 27.57% vs 4.85% for FLYU. On fees, FLYU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, WEBL has been the lower-risk option at 19.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLYU or WEBL?

Over the 3-year period, WEBL has performed better with a 27.57% return vs 4.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLYU or WEBL?

FLYU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for WEBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLYU or WEBL?

WEBL has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.00% for FLYU.

What is the main difference between FLYU and WEBL?

FLYU tracks MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index, while WEBL tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: REX and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FLYU and 1.17% for WEBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLYU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.