FLYU vs. MUU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU).

FLYU and MUU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLYU is a passively managed fund by REX that tracks the performance of the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. It was launched on Jun 22, 2022. MUU is an actively managed fund by Direxion. It was launched on Oct 9, 2024.

Performance

FLYU vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FLYU vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs	-36.34%	-2.29%	21.67%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	41.27%	599.03%	-43.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLYU achieves a -36.34% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 41.27% return.

FLYU

• 1D: 3.74%
• 1M: -14.51%
• YTD: -36.34%
• 6M: -33.82%
• 1Y: -1.88%
• 3Y*: 4.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MUU

• 1D: 17.77%
• 1M: -25.73%
• YTD: 41.27%
• 6M: 205.92%
• 1Y: 904.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLYU vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.

MUU

Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares

FLYU

MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs

Return for Risk

FLYU vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLYU

FLYU Risk / Return Rank: 15
FLYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FLYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FLYU Omega Ratio Rank: 21
FLYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FLYU Martin Ratio Rank: 11

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 98
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLYU vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLYU	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.02	7.00	-7.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	3.86	-3.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.52	-0.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.04	17.99	-18.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.11	50.69	-50.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLYU vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLYU Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 7.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLYU and MUU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLYU	MUU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02	7.00	-7.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	1.77	-1.65

Correlation

The correlation between FLYU and MUU is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FLYU vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

FLYU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%.

	TTM	2025	2024
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	3.42%	4.27%	0.31%

Drawdowns

FLYU vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLYU drawdown since its inception was -69.00%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYU and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLYU	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.00%	-75.07%	+6.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.33%	-52.72%	+0.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.50%	-38.92%	-10.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.81%	-25.08%	-0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.34%	18.71%	+2.63%

Volatility

FLYU vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU) is 26.58%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 47.51%. This indicates that FLYU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLYU	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.58%	47.51%	-20.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.62%	99.28%	-44.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.66%	130.64%	-37.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.98%	127.68%	-44.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.98%	127.68%	-44.70%