FLXU.L vs. FUQA.L

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FLXU.L (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF) and FUQA.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FLXU.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while FUQA.L tracks the Fidelity US Quality Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLXU.L returned 12.88%/yr vs 12.73%/yr for FUQA.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

FLXU.L vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FLXU.L is traded in GBP, while FUQA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FUQA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXU.L achieves a 12.34% return, which is significantly higher than FUQA.L's 9.37% return.

FLXU.L

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 12.34%
• 6M: 12.16%
• 1Y: 29.17%
• 3Y*: 16.14%
• 5Y*: 12.88%
• 10Y*: —

FUQA.L

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: 9.37%
• 6M: 9.76%
• 1Y: 25.62%
• 3Y*: 15.82%
• 5Y*: 12.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXU.L vs. FUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLXU.L Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF	12.34%	13.11%	12.50%	8.51%	2.19%	28.57%	5.69%	24.32%	1.87%	8.87%
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc	9.37%	8.56%	19.50%	11.85%	-0.00%	27.82%	8.23%	27.23%	1.10%	7.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXU.L and FUQA.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2017	0.90

The correlation between FLXU.L and FUQA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLXU.L vs. FUQA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLXU.L	FUQA.L
Technology	37.1%	37.1%
Communication Services	11.2%	9.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	9.3%
Financial Services	10.1%	12.4%
Industrials	10.1%	8.7%
Healthcare	10.0%	9.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	4.5%
Real Estate	2.7%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.6%	2.2%
Utilities	1.4%	2.0%
Energy	0.9%	3.1%

Return for Risk

FLXU.L vs. FUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXU.L

FLXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 90
FLXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FLXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FLXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FLXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FLXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 91

FUQA.L

FUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 89
FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXU.L vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLXU.L	FUQA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	2.68	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	3.72	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.51	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.10	4.24	+0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.29	17.02	+1.27

FLXU.L vs. FUQA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXU.L and FUQA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLXU.L vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXU.L drawdown since its inception was -24.72%, smaller than the maximum FUQA.L drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXU.L and FUQA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLXU.L	FUQA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.72%	-27.34%	+2.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.90%	-6.01%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.13%	-20.49%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.13%	-20.49%	+0.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.31%	0.00%	-1.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.80%	-7.08%	+4.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	1.50%	+0.15%

Volatility

FLXU.L vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) at 2.63%. This indicates that FLXU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLXU.L	FUQA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.58%	2.63%	+0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.59%	6.73%	+1.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.60%	9.53%	+2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.12%	19.12%	-6.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.88%	22.41%	-7.53%

FLXU.L vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLXU.L and FUQA.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLXU.L vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLXU.L nor FUQA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLXU.L and FUQA.L in my portfolio?

FLXU.L and FUQA.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLXU.L or FUQA.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLXU.L or FUQA.L?

FLXU.L and FUQA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

What is the main difference between FLXU.L and FUQA.L?

FLXU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FUQA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Fidelity.