PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXSX vs. CSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXSX vs. CSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Small Cap Index Fund (FLXSX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXSX achieves a 17.21% return, which is significantly higher than CSMDX's 11.73% return.


FLXSX

1D
0.33%
1M
3.96%
YTD
17.21%
6M
16.56%
1Y
38.39%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*

CSMDX

1D
0.53%
1M
2.59%
YTD
11.73%
6M
10.42%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXSX vs. CSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLXSX
Fidelity Flex Small Cap Index Fund
17.21%12.02%11.67%17.11%-20.29%14.84%20.06%25.69%-11.13%14.28%
CSMDX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund
11.73%2.72%2.24%18.89%-14.89%22.60%8.29%29.90%-5.20%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXSX and CSMDX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2017

0.92

The correlation between FLXSX and CSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXSX vs. CSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXSX
FLXSX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FLXSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

CSMDX
CSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXSX vs. CSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Small Cap Index Fund (FLXSX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLXSXCSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.22

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

2.00

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.73

6.13

+5.60

FLXSX vs. CSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the CSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXSX and CSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLXSXCSMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

1.27

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.28

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.45

-0.03

Drawdowns

FLXSX vs. CSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXSX drawdown since its inception was -41.72%, which is greater than CSMDX's maximum drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXSX and CSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXSXCSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.72%

-37.28%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.25%

-9.20%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.48%

-24.60%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.88%

-24.60%

-7.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.53%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.44%

-5.77%

-4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

3.00%

+0.48%

Volatility

FLXSX vs. CSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Flex Small Cap Index Fund (FLXSX) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) at 3.70%. This indicates that FLXSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXSXCSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

3.70%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.19%

10.24%

+3.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.72%

14.46%

+5.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.66%

18.16%

+4.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.00%

19.17%

+4.83%

FLXSX vs. CSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CSMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLXSX vs. CSMDX - Dividend Comparison

FLXSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSMDX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund
2.81%3.14%1.33%0.81%4.07%6.67%0.38%2.61%4.40%0.13%
FLXSX
Fidelity Flex Small Cap Index Fund
0.00%0.00%1.36%1.49%1.26%2.74%1.06%2.86%2.31%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXSX and CSMDX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLXSX has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to CSMDX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLXSX dropped -41.72% vs CSMDX's -37.28%.

FLXSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXSX and CSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer