PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IWM vs. FLXSX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


IWMFLXSX
YTD Return18.17%18.33%
1Y Return33.39%33.79%
3Y Return (Ann)0.75%0.99%
5Y Return (Ann)9.60%9.83%
Sharpe Ratio1.881.90
Sortino Ratio2.702.75
Omega Ratio1.331.33
Calmar Ratio1.601.65
Martin Ratio10.8310.97
Ulcer Index3.76%3.74%
Daily Std Dev21.63%21.59%
Max Drawdown-59.05%-41.72%
Current Drawdown-2.73%-2.67%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between IWM and FLXSX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

IWM vs. FLXSX - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWM having a 18.17% return and FLXSX slightly higher at 18.33%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.95%
13.19%
IWM
FLXSX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWM vs. FLXSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXSX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Expense ratio chart for IWM: current value at 0.19% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.19%
Expense ratio chart for FLXSX: current value at 0.00% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.00%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IWM vs. FLXSX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and Fidelity Flex Small Cap Index Fund (FLXSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IWM, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.88
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IWM, currently valued at 2.70, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.70
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IWM, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IWM, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.60
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IWM, currently valued at 10.83, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0010.83
FLXSX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLXSX, currently valued at 1.90, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.90
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLXSX, currently valued at 2.75, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.75
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FLXSX, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLXSX, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.65
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FLXSX, currently valued at 10.97, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0010.97

IWM vs. FLXSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the FLXSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWM and FLXSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.88
1.90
IWM
FLXSX

Dividends

IWM vs. FLXSX - Dividend Comparison

IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than FLXSX's 1.27% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
1.09%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%1.26%1.23%
FLXSX
Fidelity Flex Small Cap Index Fund
1.27%1.49%1.26%1.10%1.06%1.31%1.16%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IWM vs. FLXSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWM drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than FLXSX's maximum drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWM and FLXSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.73%
-2.67%
IWM
FLXSX

Volatility

IWM vs. FLXSX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and Fidelity Flex Small Cap Index Fund (FLXSX) have volatilities of 7.49% and 7.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.49%
7.52%
IWM
FLXSX