FLXI vs. XLG
FLXI (Invesco Flexible Income ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLXI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Invesco, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. FLXI is actively managed, while XLG is passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLXI charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.
Performance
FLXI vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FLXI
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLG
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- 1Y
- 18.33%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 14.43%
- 10Y*
- 16.79%
FLXI vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FLXI Invesco Flexible Income ETF | 8,673.64% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 7.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXI and XLG is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXI vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
FLXI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLG
FLXI vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Flexible Income ETF (FLXI) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLXI | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.48 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.10 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLXI vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXI drawdown since its inception was -3.52%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXI and XLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXI | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -52.39% | +48.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -5.02% | +4.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -7.63% | +6.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.60% | — |
Volatility
FLXI vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXI | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13,903.83% | 14.07% | +13,889.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13,903.83% | 18.82% | +13,885.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13,903.83% | 18.87% | +13,884.96% |
FLXI vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXI has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLXI vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
FLXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than XLG's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXI Invesco Flexible Income ETF | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.65% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXI and XLG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FLXI.
FLXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.65% for XLG.
FLXI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while XLG is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FLXI and 0.20% for XLG.
Find the right allocation for FLXI and XLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer